Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70-233, CdMx 04510, Mexico.
Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, Box 2437, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Syst Biol. 2019 Sep 1;68(5):767-780. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz013.
Understanding the evolution of biodiversity on Earth is a central aim in biology. Currently, various disciplines of science contribute to unravel evolution at all levels of life, from individual organisms to species and higher ranks, using different approaches and specific terminologies. The search for common origin, traditionally called homology, is a connecting paradigm of all studies related to evolution. However, it is not always sufficiently taken into account that defining homology depends on the hierarchical level studied (organism, population, and species), which can cause confusion. Therefore, we propose a framework to define homologies making use of existing terms, which refer to homology in different fields, but restricting them to an unambiguous meaning and a particular hierarchical level. We propose to use the overarching term "homology" only when "morphological homology," "vertical gene transfer," and "phylogenetic homology" are confirmed. Consequently, neither phylogenetic nor morphological homology is equal to homology. This article is intended for readers with different research backgrounds. We challenge their traditional approaches, inviting them to consider the proposed framework and offering them a new perspective for their own research.
理解地球上生物多样性的演化是生物学的一个核心目标。目前,各个科学学科都在利用不同的方法和特定的术语,从个体生物到物种和更高的分类等级,来揭示生命演化的奥秘。传统上被称为同源性的寻找共同起源,是与进化相关的所有研究的连接范式。然而,人们并没有充分认识到定义同源性取决于所研究的层次(生物个体、种群和物种),这可能会导致混淆。因此,我们提出了一个利用现有术语来定义同源性的框架,这些术语在不同领域都指同源性,但将其限制在明确的含义和特定的层次上。我们建议只有在确认“形态同源性”、“垂直基因转移”和“系统发育同源性”时才使用“同源性”这一笼统术语。因此,系统发育同源性和形态同源性都不等于同源性。本文面向具有不同研究背景的读者。我们挑战他们的传统方法,邀请他们考虑所提出的框架,并为他们自己的研究提供一个新的视角。