Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE

Only scarce data are available on the possibility to include radiobiological optimization as part of the dosimetric process in cervical cancer treated with brachytherapy (BT). We compared dosimetric outcomes of pulse-dose-rate (PDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR)-BT, according to linear-quadratic model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three-dimensional dosimetric data of 10 consecutive patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary image-guided adaptive PDR-BT after external beam radiation therapy were examined. A new HDR plan was generated for each patient using the same method as for the PDR plan. The procedure was intended to achieve the same D high-risk clinical target volume with HDR as with PDR planning after conversion into dose equivalent per 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) following linear-quadratic model. Plans were compared for dosimetric variables.

RESULTS

As per study's methodology, the D high-risk clinical target volume was strictly identical between PDR and HDR plans: 91.0 Gy (interquartile: 86.0-94.6 Gy). The median D intermediate-risk clinical target volume was 62.9 Gy with HDR vs. 65.0 Gy with PDR (p < 0.001). The median bladder D was 65.6 Gy with HDR, vs. 62 Gy with PDR (p = 0.004). Doses to the rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were higher with HDR plans with a median D of 55.6 Gy (vs. 55.1 Gy, p = 0.027), 67.2 Gy (vs. S 64.7 Gy, p = 0.002), and 69.4 Gy (vs. 66.8 Gy, p = 0.014), respectively. For organs at risk (OARs), the effect of radiobiological weighting depended on the dose delivered. When OARs BT contribution to D doses was <20 Gy, both BT modalities were equivalent. OARs EQD2 doses were all higher with HDR when BT contribution to D was ≥20 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Both BT modalities provided satisfactory target volume coverage with a slightly higher value with the HDR technique for OARs D2 while intermediate-risk clinical target volume received higher dose in the PDR plan. The radiobiological benefit of PDR over HDR was predominant when BT contribution dose to OARs was >20 Gy.