Suppr超能文献

将谵妄和医院获得性虚弱统一为突触功能障碍的假说。

A unifying hypothesis for delirium and hospital-acquired weakness as synaptic dysfunctions.

机构信息

TriStar Centennial Medical Center, United States.

Washington University in St Louis, Pre-Medical School Program, United States.

出版信息

Med Hypotheses. 2019 Mar;124:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss a unifying hypothesis, supported by Hebbian theory, that postulates that both delirium/toxic-metabolic encephalopathy (DTME) and hospital-acquired weakness (HAW) obey to a similar underlying anatomic site of dysfunction: the synapse. A brief historical and current state of endorsing knowledge summarizing its plausibility is presented. Both DTME and HAW are commonly encountered conditions in clinical practice. It is estimated that up to 30-70% of hospitalized patients will develop DTME and/or HAW. The currently available explanations in the pathophysiology of these conditions vary widely, and there is no consensus explanation on their etiopathogenesis. The disease state itself, inflammation, exo- and endo-toxins and decreased use of the synapse leads to their dysfunction which likely extends to other key cells in the micromilieu such as microglia, astrocytes, capillaries, Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes, and the blood brain barrier, all of which participate in the homeostasis and wellbeing of the synapses. Additional disruption of the micromilieu or presence of synaptotoxins (such as benzodiazepines, cytokines, anesthetics, and others) would allow entry into the neural tissue that could induce, aggravate or accelerate the synaptic dysfunction. As we enter the era of the connectome and synaptome, the Hebbian-endorsed synapse-centered hypothesis (heterogenous neuronal microdisconnections) attempts to unify the hypotheses of delirium/toxic-metabolic encephalopathy and hospital-acquired weakness into a single etiopathomechanism.

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了一个统一的假说,该假说得到了赫布理论的支持,假设谵妄/中毒性代谢性脑病 (DTME) 和医院获得性肌无力 (HAW) 都遵循类似的功能障碍解剖部位:突触。简要介绍了支持其合理性的历史和当前知识状态。DTME 和 HAW 都是临床实践中常见的病症。据估计,多达 30-70%的住院患者会出现 DTME 和/或 HAW。这些病症的目前可用的病理生理学解释差异很大,其病因发病机制也没有共识解释。疾病状态本身、炎症、外源性和内源性毒素以及突触使用减少导致其功能障碍,这可能会扩展到微环境中的其他关键细胞,如小胶质细胞、星形胶质细胞、毛细血管、施万细胞、少突胶质细胞和血脑屏障,所有这些细胞都参与了突触的稳态和健康。微环境的进一步破坏或突触毒素(如苯二氮䓬类、细胞因子、麻醉剂等)的存在会允许进入神经组织,从而引发、加重或加速突触功能障碍。随着我们进入连接组和突触组时代,赫布支持的以突触为中心的假说(异质神经元微连接)试图将谵妄/中毒性代谢性脑病和医院获得性肌无力的假说统一到一个单一的病因发病机制中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验