Department of Oral Implantology and Dental Prosthesis, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Oral Implantology, Universidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;47(4):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
The aim of this systematic literature review was to analyze clinical outcomes of pterygoid implant for the treatment of patients with atrophic posterior maxillae and to provide clinical recommendations for this dental implant technique. An extensive search of electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Lilacs, Embase, and Cochrane Library) was conducted, for articles published between January 1995 and January 2018, to identify literature presenting clinical outcomes of pterygoid implants in the treatment of patients with atrophic posterior maxillae. The systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA/PICO statement guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed (Australian National Health and Medical Research Council scale). The relative risk of implant failure was analyzed within a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). After screening 331 abstracts from the electronic databases, 36 full-text articles were accessed for eligibility, and a total of 6 studies were included in this systematic review (after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria). All studies were retrospective in nature and were classified with a poor level of evidence. A total of 634 patients received 1.893 pterygoid implants, with a mean implant survival rate of 94.87%. The mean prevalence of implant failure was 0.056 with a 95% CI of 0.04-0.077. This study demonstrates that pterygoid implants can be successfully used in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, given the presence of uncontrolled confounding factors in the included studies.
本系统文献回顾的目的是分析翼状种植体治疗萎缩性上颌后部的临床效果,并为这种牙种植技术提供临床建议。对电子数据库(PubMed/Medline、Science Direct、Lilacs、Embase 和 Cochrane Library)进行了广泛搜索,以确定 1995 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间发表的关于翼状种植体治疗萎缩性上颌后部患者的临床效果的文献。系统评价符合 PRISMA/PICO 声明指南进行,并评估了偏倚风险(澳大利亚国家健康与医疗研究委员会量表)。在 95%置信区间(95%CI)内分析了种植体失败的相对风险。在对电子数据库中的 331 篇摘要进行筛选后,查阅了 36 篇全文文章以确定其是否符合入选标准,共有 6 项研究(在应用纳入和排除标准后)被纳入本系统评价。所有研究均为回顾性研究,证据水平较差。共有 634 名患者接受了 1893 个翼状种植体,平均种植体存活率为 94.87%。种植体失败的平均发生率为 0.056,95%CI 为 0.04-0.077。本研究表明,翼状种植体可成功用于治疗萎缩性上颌后部的患者。然而,鉴于纳入研究中存在不可控的混杂因素,结果应谨慎解释。