• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性颈动脉狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术的时机:当前趋势的快照及对早期手术改变模式的文献系统评价。

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Snapshot of Current Trends and Systematic Review of Literature on Changing Paradigm towards Early Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):E214-E225. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy557.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyy557
PMID:30799491
Abstract

Carotid revascularization has been recommended as the maximally beneficial treatment for stroke prevention in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS). The appropriate timing for performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the first 14 d after the occurrence of the index event remains controversial. We aim to provide a snapshot of the pertinent current literature related to the timing of CEA for patients with SCS. A systematic review of literature was conducted to study the timing of CEA for SCS. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) were followed. A total of 63 articles were identified as relevant to this topic. A summary of 15 articles favoring urgent CEA (within 48 h) for SCS within 48 h of index event and 9 articles not favoring urgent CEA is presented. A consensus is still to be achieved on the ideal timing of CEA for SCS within the 14-d window presently prescribed. The current literature suggests that patients who undergo urgent CEA (within 48 h) after nondisabling stroke as the index event have an increased periprocedural risk as compared to those who had transient ischemic attack (TIA) as the index event. Further prospective studies and clinical trials studying this question with separate groups classified as per the index event are required to shed more light on the subject. The current literature points to a changing paradigm towards early carotid surgery, specifically targeted within 48 h if the index event is TIA, and within 7 d if the index event is stroke.

摘要

颈动脉血运重建术已被推荐为预防近期症状性颈动脉狭窄(SCS)患者中风的最佳治疗方法。在指数事件发生后的最初 14 天内进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的适当时机仍存在争议。我们旨在提供与 SCS 患者 CEA 时机相关的当前相关文献的概述。对文献进行了系统回顾,以研究 SCS 患者的 CEA 时机。遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。确定了 63 篇与该主题相关的文章。总结了 15 篇赞成在指数事件发生后 48 小时内对 SCS 进行紧急 CEA(48 小时内)的文章,以及 9 篇不赞成紧急 CEA 的文章。目前,对于 14 天治疗窗口内 SCS 的 CEA 理想时机,尚未达成共识。目前的文献表明,与指数事件为短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者相比,经历非致残性中风作为指数事件后立即进行紧急 CEA(48 小时内)的患者围手术期风险增加。需要进一步的前瞻性研究和临床试验,对该问题进行研究,并根据指数事件将患者分为不同的组,以更深入地了解该问题。目前的文献表明,颈动脉手术的时机正在发生变化,特别是如果指数事件是 TIA,则在 48 小时内,如果指数事件是中风,则在 7 天内。

相似文献

1
Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Snapshot of Current Trends and Systematic Review of Literature on Changing Paradigm towards Early Surgery.症状性颈动脉狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术的时机:当前趋势的快照及对早期手术改变模式的文献系统评价。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):E214-E225. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy557.
2
Summary of Evidence on Early Carotid Intervention for Recently Symptomatic Stenosis Based on Meta-Analysis of Current Risks.基于当前风险荟萃分析的近期有症状颈动脉狭窄早期干预证据总结
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3423-36. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010764. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
3
The different scenarios of urgent carotid revascularization for crescendo and single transient ischemic attack.对于频繁发作和单次短暂性脑缺血发作的紧急颈动脉血运重建的不同情况。
Vascular. 2019 Feb;27(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/1708538118799225. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery.关于近期有症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术手术风险与手术时机关系的系统评价。
Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):e564-72. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558528. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
5
Wait times among patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis requiring carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention.有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者需要颈动脉内膜切除术预防中风的等待时间。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Sep;56(3):661-7.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 May 16.
6
A retrospective study on early carotid endarterectomy within 48 hours after transient ischemic attack and stroke in evolution.一项关于短暂性脑缺血发作和进展性卒中后48小时内早期颈动脉内膜切除术的回顾性研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;28(1):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
7
Comparison of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a single center study.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:单中心研究。
Adv Ther. 2013 Sep;30(9):845-53. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0058-8. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
Risk of early recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄患者早期复发性卒中的风险
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
9
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients With Crescendo Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Systematic Review.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术治疗递增性短暂性脑缺血发作患者:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2952.
10
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2150-2157. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016824. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the Common Carotid Artery Bifurcation: A Comparative Assessment of Landmark-Based Methods.预测颈总动脉分叉:基于地标方法的比较评估。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87552. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Emergency Carotid Thrombo-Endarterectomy after Failed Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Complete Carotid Occlusion: A Case Report.急性完全性颈动脉闭塞血管内再通失败后行急诊颈动脉血栓内膜切除术:1例报告
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 30;14(9):882. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090882.
3
Anesthetic Management of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for a Patient with Concomitant Pheochromocytoma and Bilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis.
合并嗜铬细胞瘤和双侧颈动脉狭窄患者腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的麻醉管理
Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan 7;2023:2172464. doi: 10.1155/2023/2172464. eCollection 2023.
4
Clinically induced hypothermia with cardiopulmonary support in a high-risk patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy.在一名接受颈动脉内膜切除术的高危患者中,采用心肺支持进行临床诱导低温治疗。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 Mar 4;8(2):171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.02.002. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
In-Hospital Outcomes of Urgent, Early, or Late Revascularization for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者紧急、早期或晚期血运重建的住院结局。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):100-107. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032410. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.风险预测模型的外部验证可改善颈动脉内膜切除术患者的选择。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):87-99. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032527. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Clinical perspectives on ischemic stroke.缺血性脑卒中的临床观点。
Exp Neurol. 2021 Apr;338:113599. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113599. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
8
Changes in Neuroendovascular Procedural Volume During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Multicenter Study.COVID-19 大流行期间神经血管介入手术量的变化:一项国际多中心研究。
J Neuroimaging. 2021 Jan;31(1):171-179. doi: 10.1111/jon.12803. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
In-hospital recurrence in a Chinese large cohort with acute ischemic stroke.中国大型急性缺血性脑卒中队列的院内复发。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 18;9(1):14945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51277-8.