Huang Zekai, Li Shaolei, Yang Xin, Lu Fangliang, Huang Miao, Zhang Shanyuan, Xiong Ying, Zhang Panpan, Si Jiahui, Ma Yuanyuan, Yang Yue
Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China,
Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Feb 8;11:1299-1308. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S195355. eCollection 2019.
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) is not well established.
We retrospectively reviewed 228 patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 through December 2016. The probabilities of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by means of the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the use of the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of DFS and OS were performed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Propensity score matching analysis was performed for further analysis regarding the benefit of adjuvant therapy.
The pathological complete response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was achieved in 13 of 228 patients (5.7%). With a median follow-up of 59.6 months, the median DFS and OS were 35.4 and 45.4 months, respectively. The multivariate Cox model determined chemotherapy regimens (=0.003) and ypT category (=0.006) were significant independent predictors of DFS; and chemotherapy regimens (=0.001), ypT category (<0.001), and ypN category (=0.013) were significant independent predictors of OS. Furthermore, patients who received adjuvant therapy seemed to be associated with poorer survival (both DFS and OS) compared with those who did not in full cohort (=0.001 and =0.184, respectively) and matched cohort (=0.251 and =0.374, respectively).
Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applicable. Chemotherapy regimens and ypT category were significant independent predictors of both DFS and OS and ypN category was also a significant independent predictor of OS. However, these patients did not seem to benefit from subsequent adjuvant therapy. The necessity of adjuvant therapy requires further investigation.
新辅助化疗及后续辅助治疗在局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者治疗中的作用尚未明确。
我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2016年12月期间228例接受新辅助化疗后行食管切除术的局部晚期ESCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的概率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。使用Cox比例风险模型对DFS和OS的预测因素进行单因素和多因素分析。进行倾向评分匹配分析以进一步分析辅助治疗的益处。
228例患者中有13例(5.7%)实现了新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解。中位随访59.6个月,中位DFS和OS分别为35.4个月和45.4个月。多因素Cox模型确定化疗方案(P=0.003)和ypT分类(P=0.006)是DFS的显著独立预测因素;化疗方案(P=0.001)、ypT分类(P<0.001)和ypN分类(P=0.013)是OS的显著独立预测因素。此外,与未接受辅助治疗的患者相比,接受辅助治疗的患者在全队列中DFS和OS似乎均较差(分别为P=0.001和P=0.184),在匹配队列中也是如此(分别为P=0.251和P=0.3)。
新辅助化疗后手术是可行的。化疗方案和ypT分类是DFS和OS的显著独立预测因素,ypN分类也是OS的显著独立预测因素。然而,这些患者似乎未从后续辅助治疗中获益。辅助治疗的必要性需要进一步研究。