Ning Zhong-Hua, Zhao Wei, Li Xiao-Dong, Chen Lu-Jun, Xu Bin, Gu Wen-Dong, Shao Ying-Jie, Xu Yun, Huang Jin, Pei Hong-Lei, Jiang Jing-Ting
Department of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou 213003, China ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou 213003, China.
Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou 213003, China.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Jun 1;8(6):6881-90. eCollection 2015.
Prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains dismal even after curative resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. New biomarkers for predicting prognosis and treatment outcomes are needed for improved treatment stratification of patients with locally advanced ESCC. The prognostic and treatment predictive significance of perineural invasion (PNI) in the locally advanced ESCC remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of PNI on the outcomes of locally advanced ESCC patients after curative resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).
We retrospectively reviewed 262 consecutive locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent curative resection. Tumors sections were re-evaluated for PNI by an independent pathologist blinded to the patients' outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method; univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI.
Finally, 243 patients were analyzed and enrolled into this study, of which 132 received PORT. PNI was identified in 22.2% (54/243) of the pathologic sections. The 5-year DFS was favorable for PNI-negative patients versus PNI-positive patients (21.3% vs. 36.7%, respectively; P = 0.005). The 5-year OS was 40.3% for PNI-negative patients versus 21.7% for PNI-positive patients (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, PNI was an independent prognostic factor. In a subset analysis for patients received PORT, PNI was evaluated as a prognostic predictor as well (P < 0.05). In contrast to patients without PORT, PORT couldn't improve the disease recurrence and survival in locally advanced ESCC patients with PNI-positive (P > 0.05).
PNI could serve as an independent prognostic factor and prognosticate treatment outcomes in locally advanced ESCC patients. The PNI status should be considered when stratifying high-risk locally advanced ESCC patients for adjuvant radiotherapy. Future prospective study is warranted to confirm our results.
即使经过根治性切除和辅助放疗,局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的预后仍然很差。需要新的生物标志物来预测预后和治疗结果,以改善局部晚期ESCC患者的治疗分层。局部晚期ESCC中神经周围侵犯(PNI)的预后和治疗预测意义仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨PNI对局部晚期ESCC患者根治性切除联合或不联合术后放疗(PORT)后结局的影响。
我们回顾性分析了262例连续接受根治性切除的局部晚期ESCC患者。由一位对患者结局不知情的独立病理学家对肿瘤切片进行PNI重新评估。采用Kaplan-Meier法确定总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS);单因素对数秩检验和多因素Cox比例风险模型用于评估PNI的预后价值。
最终,243例患者被纳入本研究并进行分析,其中132例接受了PORT。病理切片中PNI的发生率为22.2%(54/243)。PNI阴性患者的5年DFS优于PNI阳性患者(分别为21.3%和36.7%;P = 0.005)。PNI阴性患者的5年OS为40.3%,而PNI阳性患者为21.7%(P < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,PNI是一个独立的预后因素。在接受PORT的患者亚组分析中,PNI也被评估为预后预测指标(P < 0.05)。与未接受PORT的患者相比,PORT并不能改善PNI阳性的局部晚期ESCC患者的疾病复发和生存情况(P > 0.05)。
PNI可作为局部晚期ESCC患者的独立预后因素,并能预测治疗结局。在对高危局部晚期ESCC患者进行辅助放疗分层时,应考虑PNI状态。未来有必要进行前瞻性研究以证实我们的结果。