Rizvi Syed Mohd Danish, Alshammari Abdulaziz Arif A, Almawkaa Waleed Abdullah, Ahmed Abo Bakr F, Katamesh Ahmed, Alafnan Ahmed, Almutairi Tariq J, Alshammari Rakan F
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
2College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
3 Biotech. 2019 Mar;9(3):70. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1594-y. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
Cancer prevalence has increased at an alarming rate worldwide. Complexity, resistance mechanism and multiple compensatory survival pathways of cancer cells have abated the response of currently available cancer medications. Therefore, multi-target agents rather than single target might provide a better solution to these cancer therapy issues. In the present study, anti-PLK1 (Polo-like kinase 1) potential of the eight FDA-approved (2017) anti-cancer drugs have been explored using molecular docking approach. Out of all the tested drugs, brigatinib, niraparib and ribociclib showed better binding affinity towards the 'kinase domain' of PLK1. The Gibbs free binding energy (Δ) and inhibition constant ( ) values for brigatinib, niraparib and ribociclib interaction with the kinase domain of PLK1 were '- 8.05 kcal/mol and 1.26 µM', '- 8.35 kcal/mol and 0.729 µM' and '- 7.29 kcal/mol and 4.52 µM', respectively. Interestingly, the docking results of these three drugs were better than the known PLK1 inhibitors (BI-2536 and rigosertib). The Δ and values for BI-2536 and rigosertib interaction with the kinase domain of PLK1 were '- 6.8 kcal/mol and 10.38 µM' and '- 6.6 kcal/mol and 14.51 µM', respectively. Brigatinib, niraparib and ribociclib have been approved by FDA for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian/fallopian tube cancer and breast cancer, respectively. PLK1 is regarded as a potential cancer target, and it is specifically over-expressed in different types of cancer cells, including aforementioned cancers. Actually, the target enzymes for anti-cancer action of brigatinib, niraparib and ribociclib are tyrosine kinase, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, respectively. However, based on our outcomes, we could safely state that PLK1 might plausibly emerge as an add-on target for each of these three anti-cancer drugs. We strongly believe that this study would assist in the development of better dual-targeting cancer therapeutic agent in the near future.
全球癌症患病率正以惊人的速度上升。癌细胞的复杂性、耐药机制和多种代偿性生存途径削弱了现有癌症药物的疗效。因此,多靶点药物而非单靶点药物可能为这些癌症治疗问题提供更好的解决方案。在本研究中,采用分子对接方法探索了8种美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2017年批准的抗癌药物对PLK1(Polo样激酶1)的抑制潜力。在所有测试药物中,布加替尼、尼拉帕利和瑞博西尼对PLK1的“激酶结构域”表现出更好的结合亲和力。布加替尼、尼拉帕利和瑞博西尼与PLK1激酶结构域相互作用的吉布斯自由结合能(Δ)和抑制常数( )值分别为“-8.05千卡/摩尔和1.26微摩尔”、“-8.35千卡/摩尔和0.729微摩尔”以及“-7.29千卡/摩尔和4.52微摩尔”。有趣的是,这三种药物的对接结果优于已知的PLK1抑制剂(BI-2536和rigosertib)。BI-2536和rigosertib与PLK1激酶结构域相互作用的Δ和 值分别为“-6.8千卡/摩尔和10.38微摩尔”以及“-6.6千卡/摩尔和14.51微摩尔”。布加替尼、尼拉帕利和瑞博西尼已分别被FDA批准用于治疗非小细胞肺癌、卵巢/输卵管癌和乳腺癌。PLK1被视为一个潜在的癌症靶点,并且在包括上述癌症在内的不同类型癌细胞中特异性过表达。实际上,布加替尼、尼拉帕利和瑞博西尼的抗癌作用靶点酶分别是酪氨酸激酶、聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6。然而,基于我们的研究结果,我们可以有把握地说,PLK1可能有望成为这三种抗癌药物各自的附加靶点。我们坚信,这项研究将有助于在不久的将来开发出更好的双靶点癌症治疗药物。