Hirsch Mark A, Nguyen Vu Q C, Wieczorek Nicholas S, Rhoads Charles F, Weaver Paul R
Senior Scientist, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Core Laboratory.
Director, Carolinas Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Core Laboratory.
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Nov 21;13:10655. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10655.
The debate format has been infrequently used in resident education. We used the panel debate format as a tool to improve health care professionals' knowledge of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
Six physical medicine and rehabilitation resident physician debaters led a 60-minute panel debate about the PPACA. Outcome measures included a survey of the spectators with validated questions on physician attitudes towards health care reform in the US and open-ended questions regarding Americans' views on the US health care system.
Twenty-nine physician and nonphysician faculty and staff participated as spectators. Responses to the questions on attitudes toward reform of the health care system indicated that zero spectators rated the current US health care system (i.e., the PPACA) as "Excellent," 25% rated it as "Good," 42% "Average," 25% "Poor," and 8% "Failing." Half of the respondents indicated they support a US president who advocates making the US health care system more like those of other countries. The majority of respondents (89%) expressed the idea that the US does not have the best health care system in the world.
Approaching a topic as broad as health care reform with the debate format promoted knowledge, reflection, and interaction with both the opposing debaters and audience.
辩论形式在住院医师教育中很少被使用。我们采用小组辩论形式作为一种工具,以提高医疗保健专业人员对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(PPACA)的了解。
六位物理医学与康复住院医师辩论者主持了一场关于PPACA的60分钟小组辩论。结果测量包括对观众的一项调查,其中有关于医生对美国医疗保健改革态度的经过验证的问题,以及关于美国人对美国医疗保健系统看法的开放式问题。
29位医生和非医生教职员工作为观众参与。对关于医疗保健系统改革态度问题的回答表明,没有观众将当前的美国医疗保健系统(即PPACA)评为“优秀”,25%评为“良好”,42%评为“中等”,25%评为“差”,8%评为“不及格”。一半的受访者表示他们支持主张使美国医疗保健系统更像其他国家的美国总统。大多数受访者(89%)表达了美国没有世界上最好的医疗保健系统这一观点。
以辩论形式探讨像医疗保健改革这样广泛的主题促进了知识、反思以及与对立辩论者和观众的互动。