• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Teaching Health Care Policy: Using Panel Debate to Teach Residents About the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.讲授医疗保健政策:利用小组辩论向住院医师传授《患者保护与平价医疗法案》相关知识。
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Nov 21;13:10655. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10655.
2
Healthcare reform and the next generation: United States medical student attitudes toward the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.医疗改革与下一代:美国医学生对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的态度。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023557. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
3
Physician knowledge of and attitudes toward the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.医生对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的了解和态度。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Feb;150(2):229-34. doi: 10.1177/0194599813515839. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
4
The Affordable Care Act: Opportunities and Challenges for Physicians.《平价医疗法案:医生面临的机遇与挑战》
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Nov;26(8):2243-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002088.
5
Quality and Importance of Health Policy, Reform, and Public Health Topics: A Study in Physician Assistant Education.健康政策、改革及公共卫生主题的质量与重要性:医师助理教育研究
J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Jun;29(2):89-98. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000202.
6
Use of a policy debate to teach residents about health care reform.运用政策辩论向住院医师传授医疗保健改革相关知识。
J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Sep;3(3):376-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-03-03-32.
7
Health policy and cardiovascular medicine: rapid changes, immense opportunities.卫生政策与心血管医学:快速变革,巨大机遇。
Circulation. 2015 Mar 24;131(12):1098-105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013606.
8
The Affordable Care Act's Missing Consensus: Values, Attitudes, and Experiences Associated with Competing Health Reform Preferences.平价医疗法案的缺失共识:与竞争医疗改革偏好相关的价值观、态度和经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Oct 1;45(5):729-755. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8543222.
9
Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》
J Med Pract Manage. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(5):317-9.
10
Resident physicians' perspectives on health care reform.住院医师对医疗改革的看法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):30-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599811406072. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education: an Updated Systematic Review from 2017 to 2022.研究生医学教育中的倡导课程:2017 年至 2022 年的更新系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2792-2807. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08244-x. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
The Crossroads of Health Policy and Academic Medicine: An Early Introduction to Health Policy Skills to Facilitate Change.卫生政策与学术医学的交叉点:健康政策技能的早期入门以促进变革。
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 May 20;15:10827. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10827.

本文引用的文献

1
Insurance Coverage and Well-Child Visits Improved for Youth Under the Affordable Care Act, but Latino Youth Still Lag Behind.平价医疗法案改善了青年的保险覆盖范围和儿童健康检查,但拉美裔青年仍落后。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jan-Feb;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
Effect of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Emergency Department Visits: Evidence From State-Level Emergency Department Databases.平价医疗法案医疗补助扩张对急诊就诊的影响:来自州级急诊数据库的证据。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;70(2):215-225.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
No Time for Silence: An Urgent Need for Political Activism Among the Medical Community.没有时间沉默:医学界迫切需要政治行动主义。
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1231-1233. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001724.
4
A View from the Front Line - Physicians' Perspectives on ACA Repeal.来自前线的观点——医生对废除《平价医疗法案》的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 9;376(6):e8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700144. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Support for Government Provision of Health Care and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.对政府提供医疗保健及《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的支持。
Public Opin Q. 2016 Spring;80(1):114-179. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv049. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
The Perceived Impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on North Carolina's Free Clinics.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对北卡罗来纳州免费诊所的感知影响
N C Med J. 2016 Jan-Feb;77(1):23-9. doi: 10.18043/ncm.77.1.23.
7
Expected and Unexpected Consequences of the Affordable Care Act: The Impact on Patients and Surgeons-Pro and Con Arguments.《平价医疗法案》的预期与意外后果:对患者及外科医生的影响——支持与反对观点
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Feb;20(2):351-60. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-3032-8. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Using debate to teach pharmacy students about ethical issues.运用辩论向药学专业学生传授伦理问题。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Apr 17;78(3):57. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78357.
9
Audience response system: a new learning tool for urologic conferences.观众反应系统:一种用于泌尿外科会议的新型学习工具。
Can J Urol. 2013 Dec;20(6):7042-5.
10
Evidence-based nephrology-rheumatology debates: a novel educational experience during nephrology fellowship training.循证肾脏病学-风湿病学辩论:肾脏病学住院医师培训中的一种新颖教育体验。
Ren Fail. 2013 Jul;35(6):911-3. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.794681. Epub 2013 May 17.

讲授医疗保健政策:利用小组辩论向住院医师传授《患者保护与平价医疗法案》相关知识。

Teaching Health Care Policy: Using Panel Debate to Teach Residents About the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

作者信息

Hirsch Mark A, Nguyen Vu Q C, Wieczorek Nicholas S, Rhoads Charles F, Weaver Paul R

机构信息

Senior Scientist, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Core Laboratory.

Director, Carolinas Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Core Laboratory.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Nov 21;13:10655. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10655.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10655
PMID:30800856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6338139/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The debate format has been infrequently used in resident education. We used the panel debate format as a tool to improve health care professionals' knowledge of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

METHODS

Six physical medicine and rehabilitation resident physician debaters led a 60-minute panel debate about the PPACA. Outcome measures included a survey of the spectators with validated questions on physician attitudes towards health care reform in the US and open-ended questions regarding Americans' views on the US health care system.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine physician and nonphysician faculty and staff participated as spectators. Responses to the questions on attitudes toward reform of the health care system indicated that zero spectators rated the current US health care system (i.e., the PPACA) as "Excellent," 25% rated it as "Good," 42% "Average," 25% "Poor," and 8% "Failing." Half of the respondents indicated they support a US president who advocates making the US health care system more like those of other countries. The majority of respondents (89%) expressed the idea that the US does not have the best health care system in the world.

DISCUSSION

Approaching a topic as broad as health care reform with the debate format promoted knowledge, reflection, and interaction with both the opposing debaters and audience.

摘要

引言

辩论形式在住院医师教育中很少被使用。我们采用小组辩论形式作为一种工具,以提高医疗保健专业人员对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(PPACA)的了解。

方法

六位物理医学与康复住院医师辩论者主持了一场关于PPACA的60分钟小组辩论。结果测量包括对观众的一项调查,其中有关于医生对美国医疗保健改革态度的经过验证的问题,以及关于美国人对美国医疗保健系统看法的开放式问题。

结果

29位医生和非医生教职员工作为观众参与。对关于医疗保健系统改革态度问题的回答表明,没有观众将当前的美国医疗保健系统(即PPACA)评为“优秀”,25%评为“良好”,42%评为“中等”,25%评为“差”,8%评为“不及格”。一半的受访者表示他们支持主张使美国医疗保健系统更像其他国家的美国总统。大多数受访者(89%)表达了美国没有世界上最好的医疗保健系统这一观点。

讨论

以辩论形式探讨像医疗保健改革这样广泛的主题促进了知识、反思以及与对立辩论者和观众的互动。