Hanna Lezley-Anne, Barry Johanne, Donnelly Ryan, Hughes Fiona, Jones David, Laverty Garry, Parsons Carole, Ryan Cristin
School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, County Antrim, United Kingdom.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Apr 17;78(3):57. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78357.
To create, implement, and evaluate debate as a method of teaching pharmacy undergraduate students about ethical issues.
Debate workshops with 5 hours of contact with student peers and facilitators and 5 hours of self-study were developed for second-year pharmacy students. Student development of various skills and understanding of the topic were assessed by staff members and student peers.
One hundred fifty students completed the workshops. The mean score for debating was 25.9 out of 30, with scores ranging from 23.2 to 28.7. Seventy percent of students agreed that the debates were a useful teaching method in the degree program.
A series of workshops using debates effectively delivered course content on ethical issues and resulted in pharmacy students developing skills such as teamwork, peer assessment, communication, and critical evaluation. These findings suggest that pharmacy students respond favorably to a program using debates as a teaching tool.
创建、实施并评估将辩论作为一种向药学本科学生传授伦理问题的教学方法。
为二年级药学专业学生开展了辩论工作坊,其中包括与学生同伴和指导教师接触5小时以及自学5小时。工作人员和学生同伴对学生各种技能的发展以及对该主题的理解进行了评估。
150名学生完成了这些工作坊。辩论的平均得分是30分中的25.9分,分数范围在23.2至28.7分之间。70%的学生认为辩论在学位课程中是一种有用的教学方法。
一系列使用辩论的工作坊有效地传授了关于伦理问题的课程内容,并使药学专业学生培养了团队合作、同伴评估、沟通和批判性评估等技能。这些结果表明,药学专业学生对使用辩论作为教学工具的课程反应良好。