Kavuma Michael
Department of Tele-Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
MedLite Systems Limited, Kampala, Uganda.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Feb 25;6(1):e9317. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9317.
Electronic medical record (EMR) systems hold the exciting promise of accurate, real-time access to patient health care data and great potential to improve the quality of patient care through decision support to clinicians. This review evaluated the usability of EMR systems implemented in sub-Saharan Africa based on a usability evaluation criterion developed by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
This review aimed to evaluate EMR system implementations in sub-Saharan Africa against a well-defined evaluation methodology and assess their usability based on a defined set of metrics. In addition, the review aimed to identify the extent to which usability has been an enabling or hindering factor in the implementation of EMR systems in sub-Saharan Africa.
Five key metrics for evaluating EMR system usability were developed based on the methodology proposed by HIMSS. These were efficiency, effectiveness, ease of learning, cognitive load, and user satisfaction. A 5-point rating system was developed for the review. EMR systems in 19 reviewed publications were scored based on this rating system. It awarded 5 points per metric to any EMR system that was identified as excellent, 4 points for good, 3 points for fair, 2 points for poor, and 1 point for bad. In addition, each of the 5 key metrics carried a maximum weighted score of 20. The percentage scores for each metric were then computed from the weighted scores from which the final overall usability score was derived.
In possibly contributing to the usability of implemented EMR systems, ease of learning obtained the highest percentage score of 71% (SD 1.09) followed by cognitive load in second place with a score of 68% (SD 1.62). Effectiveness followed closely in third place at 67% (SD 1.47) and efficiency was in fourth place at 64% (SD 1.04). User satisfaction came in last at 63% (SD 1.70). The overall usability score for all systems was calculated to be 66%.
The usability of EMR systems implemented in sub-Saharan Africa has been good with ease of learning possibly being the biggest positive contributor to this rating. Cognitive load and effectiveness have also possibly positively influenced the usability of EMR systems, whereas efficiency and user satisfaction have perhaps contributed least to positively influencing EMR system usability.
电子病历(EMR)系统有望实现准确、实时地获取患者医疗数据,并具有通过为临床医生提供决策支持来提高患者护理质量的巨大潜力。本综述基于医疗保健信息与管理系统协会(HIMSS)制定的可用性评估标准,对撒哈拉以南非洲地区实施的电子病历系统的可用性进行了评估。
本综述旨在根据明确的评估方法,对撒哈拉以南非洲地区的电子病历系统实施情况进行评估,并根据一组既定指标评估其可用性。此外,该综述旨在确定可用性在撒哈拉以南非洲地区电子病历系统实施过程中起到促进或阻碍作用的程度。
基于HIMSS提出的方法,制定了五个评估电子病历系统可用性的关键指标。这些指标分别是效率、有效性、易学性、认知负荷和用户满意度。为该综述制定了一个五分制评分系统。根据此评分系统,对19篇综述文献中的电子病历系统进行评分。对于任何被认定为优秀的电子病历系统,每个指标给予5分;良好给予4分;中等给予3分;较差给予2分;差给予1分。此外,五个关键指标中的每个指标的最高加权分数为20分。然后根据加权分数计算每个指标的百分比分数,从中得出最终的总体可用性分数。
在可能有助于已实施电子病历系统的可用性方面,易学性获得了最高百分比分数,为71%(标准差1.09),其次是认知负荷,得分为68%(标准差1.62)。有效性紧随其后,位居第三,为67%(标准差1.47),效率位居第四,为64%(标准差1.04)。用户满意度排在最后,为63%(标准差1.70)。所有系统的总体可用性分数经计算为66%。
撒哈拉以南非洲地区实施的电子病历系统的可用性良好,易学性可能是该评分的最大积极贡献因素。认知负荷和有效性也可能对电子病历系统的可用性产生了积极影响,而效率和用户满意度对积极影响电子病历系统可用性的贡献可能最小。