Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Child and Youth Mental Health Service, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):460-476. doi: 10.1111/famp.12431. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
This article critiques the use of conversation analysis (CA) as applied to the study of family therapy. Searches of relevant databases and journals as well as citation searches were conducted in April 2018 for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included the explicit use of CA either solely or in combination with discourse analysis and discursive psychology. This resulted in the inclusion of 25 articles that were reviewed against a guideline for the evaluation of qualitative research to which five items specific to CA were added to ensure a specific and balanced evaluation of the studies. Articles generally had a good application of quality criteria although there was a variation in detail of transcription, application of sequence analysis, and a limited use of validity testing. CA has the potential to complement existing research on family therapy but requires a rigorous application of process and quality criteria. The article provides recommendations for future CA research into family therapy.
本文批评了将会话分析(CA)应用于家庭治疗研究的做法。2018 年 4 月,我们对相关数据库和期刊进行了检索,并进行了引文检索,以寻找相关文章。纳入标准包括明确使用 CA,无论是单独使用还是与话语分析和话语心理学结合使用。这导致包括 25 篇文章,这些文章根据定性研究评估指南进行了审查,其中增加了 5 项专门针对 CA 的项目,以确保对研究进行具体和平衡的评估。尽管在转录、序列分析应用和有效性测试的有限使用方面存在差异,但文章通常很好地应用了质量标准。CA 有可能补充家庭治疗现有的研究,但需要严格应用过程和质量标准。本文为未来家庭治疗的 CA 研究提供了建议。