Suppr超能文献

慢性乙型肝炎的治疗性疫苗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Therapeutic vaccination for chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2019 Jul;26(7):803-817. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13085. Epub 2019 Apr 7.

Abstract

Therapeutic vaccines may be promising treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their clinical efficacy and safety are unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of therapeutic vaccines in CHB patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar from 1990 until present and abstracts from EASL, APASL and AASLD from 2012 to 2017 and selected randomized controlled trials of CHB patients, comparing therapeutic vaccines with no treatment or standard of care. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool v2.0 and GRADE method were used. Analyses were stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status and the comparator (therapeutic vaccines vs no treatment, or therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care). Efficacy outcomes were HBeAg seroconversion, hepatitis B virus DNA reduction and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, measured at the end of treatment or end of follow-up. Effects were reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model. Fifteen studies were included. A wide variety of therapeutic vaccines were tested. For HBeAg clearance at the end of follow-up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care, RD = 0.03, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.09. For HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow-up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = -0.03, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.02, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care, RD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-0.28. There were only a few studies on HBsAg loss, and hence, the findings were inconclusive. The only efficacy finding was HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow-up for therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care; otherwise, therapeutic vaccines do not appear to be efficacious for the treatment of CHB, but were limited by few RCTs, suboptimal therapeutic vaccines and patient selection.

摘要

治疗性疫苗可能是慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)有前途的治疗方法,但它们的临床疗效和安全性尚不清楚。我们对治疗性疫苗治疗 CHB 患者的疗效和安全性进行了系统评价。我们检索了从 1990 年到现在的 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Google Scholar,以及从 2012 年到 2017 年的 EASL、APASL 和 AASLD 的摘要,并选择了比较治疗性疫苗与无治疗或标准治疗的 CHB 患者的随机对照试验。Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 v2.0 和 GRADE 方法用于分析。分析按乙型肝炎 e 抗原(HBeAg)状态和比较剂(治疗性疫苗与无治疗,或治疗性疫苗+标准治疗与标准治疗)分层。疗效终点为治疗结束或随访结束时 HBeAg 血清学转换、乙型肝炎病毒 DNA 减少和乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)丢失,采用随机效应模型报告风险差异及 95%置信区间。共纳入 15 项研究。测试了多种治疗性疫苗。对于随访结束时 HBeAg 清除,与无治疗相比,治疗性疫苗的 RD=0.01,95%CI-0.05 至 0.07,与治疗性疫苗+标准治疗相比,RD=0.03,95%CI-0.03 至 0.09。对于随访结束时的 HBVDNA 减少,与无治疗相比,RD=-0.03,95%CI-0.08 至 0.02,与治疗性疫苗+标准治疗相比,RD=0.15,95%CI0.02-0.28。关于 HBsAg 丢失的研究很少,因此结果不确定。唯一的疗效发现是治疗性疫苗+标准治疗与标准治疗相比,在随访结束时降低了 HBVDNA;否则,治疗性疫苗似乎对 CHB 的治疗无效,但受到 RCT 数量少、治疗性疫苗效果不理想和患者选择的限制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验