• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次妊娠行剖宫产术与随后妊娠的早产风险增加无关。

Term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Hospital, Delaware, DE.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):61.e1-61.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.036
PMID:30802437
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have reported an increased risk for preterm delivery following a term cesarean delivery. However, these studies did not adjust for high-risk conditions related to the first cesarean delivery and are known to recur.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether there is an association between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and subsequent spontaneous or indicated preterm delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of women with the first 2 consecutive singleton deliveries (2007-2014) identified through a linked pregnancy database at a single institution. Women with a first pregnancy that resulted in cesarean delivery at term were compared with women whose first pregnancy resulted in a vaginal delivery at term. Exclusion criteria were known to recur medical or obstetrical complications during the first pregnancy. A propensity score analysis was performed by matching women who underwent a cesarean delivery with those who underwent a vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. The association between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and preterm delivery in the second pregnancy in this matched set was examined using conditional logistic regression. The primary outcome was overall preterm delivery <37 weeks in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included type of preterm delivery (spontaneous vs indicated), late preterm delivery (34-36 6/7 weeks), early preterm delivery (<34 weeks), and small-for-gestational-age birth.

RESULTS

Of a total of 6456 linked pregnancies, 2284 deliveries were matched; 1142 were preceded by cesarean delivery and 1142 were preceded by vaginal delivery. The main indications for cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy were dystocia in 703 (61.5%), nonreassuring fetal status in 222 (19.4%), breech presentation in 100 (8.8%), and other in 84 (7.4%). The mean (SD) gestational ages at delivery for the second pregnancy was 38.8 (1.8) and 38.9 (1.7) weeks, respectively, for prior cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery. The risks of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy among women with a previous cesarean and vaginal delivery were 6.0% and 5.2%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 0.77-2.76). In an analysis stratified by the type of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy, no associations were seen between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and spontaneous preterm delivery (4.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-3.32) or indicated preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.46). Similarly, no significant differences were found in late preterm delivery (4.6% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-2.29), early preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-2.67), or neonates with birthweight less than the fifth percentile for gestational age (3.6% vs 2.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 0.52-3.06).

CONCLUSION

After robust adjustment for confounders through a propensity score analysis related to the indication for the first cesarean delivery at term, cesarean delivery is not associated with an increase in preterm delivery, spontaneous or indicated, in the subsequent pregnancy.

摘要

背景

先前的研究报告称,足月剖宫产会增加早产的风险。然而,这些研究并未调整与首次剖宫产相关的高危情况,而这些高危情况已知会再次出现。

目的

本研究旨在确定首次足月剖宫产与随后自发性或指征性早产之间是否存在关联。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了一家机构通过妊娠数据库链接的首次连续两次单胎妊娠(2007-2014 年)的女性。将首次妊娠行择期剖宫产的女性与首次妊娠行阴道分娩的女性进行比较。排除标准为首次妊娠期间已知存在复发的医学或产科并发症。通过匹配首次行剖宫产和阴道分娩的女性进行倾向评分分析。在匹配组中,使用条件逻辑回归检查首次妊娠行剖宫产与第二次妊娠早产之间的关联。主要结局为第二次妊娠<37 周的总体早产。次要结局包括早产类型(自发性早产与指征性早产)、晚期早产(34-36 6/7 周)、早期早产(<34 周)和小于胎龄儿出生。

结果

在总共 6456 个链接的妊娠中,有 2284 个分娩被匹配;1142 个妊娠前进行了剖宫产,1142 个妊娠前进行了阴道分娩。首次剖宫产的主要指征为产程困难 703 例(61.5%)、胎儿情况不乐观 222 例(19.4%)、臀位 100 例(8.8%)和其他情况 84 例(7.4%)。第二次妊娠的平均(SD)分娩孕周分别为首次剖宫产和阴道分娩后的 38.8(1.8)和 38.9(1.7)周。有过剖宫产和阴道分娩史的女性中,第二次妊娠早产的风险分别为 6.0%和 5.2%(调整后的优势比,1.46,95%置信区间 [CI],0.77-2.76)。在按第二次妊娠早产类型分层的分析中,首次剖宫产与自发性早产(4.6% vs 3.9%;调整后的优势比,1.40,95%置信区间,0.59-3.32)或指征性早产(1.6% vs 1.4%;调整后的优势比,1.21,95%置信区间,0.60-2.46)之间均未见关联。同样,晚发性早产(4.6% vs 4.1%;调整后的优势比,1.13,95%置信区间,0.55-2.29)、早期早产(1.6% vs 1.2%;调整后的优势比,1.25,95%置信区间,0.59-2.67)或出生体重低于胎龄第 5 百分位的新生儿(3.6% vs 2.2%;调整后的优势比,1.26,95%置信区间,0.52-3.06)之间也未发现显著差异。

结论

通过与首次足月剖宫产指征相关的倾向评分分析对混杂因素进行稳健调整后,剖宫产与随后妊娠的自发性或指征性早产增加无关。

相似文献

1
Term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.首次妊娠行剖宫产术与随后妊娠的早产风险增加无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):61.e1-61.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
3
Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.按预期分娩方式划分的早期早产先兆子痫结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):100.e1-100.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent delivery: a national cohort study.初产妇剖宫产分娩臀位与随后分娩的母婴发病率增加相关:一项全国性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05575-6. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.第二产程延长与随后自发性早产的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 May;2(2):100093. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100093. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in the following delivery after previous preterm caesarean breech birth: a national cohort study.既往剖宫产臀位分娩后再次分娩的母婴结局:一项全国性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):49-54. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1871888. Epub 2021 May 2.
7
Risk of spontaneous preterm birth elevated after first cesarean delivery at full dilatation: a retrospective cohort study of over 30,000 women.首次剖宫产时宫口全开后自发性早产风险升高:一项对30000多名女性的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3):358.e1-358.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Exercise during pregnancy in normal-weight women and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.正常体重女性孕期运动与早产风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Association between gestational age and severe maternal morbidity and mortality of preterm cesarean delivery: a population-based cohort study.早产剖宫产与严重孕产妇发病率和死亡率的关系:基于人群的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):399.e1-399.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
10
Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003.剖宫产对晚期早产儿和中期早产儿的影响:美国,2000 - 2003年
Birth. 2009 Mar;36(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00292.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and second-pregnancy preterm delivery.首次妊娠足月剖宫产与再次妊娠早产之间的关联。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14996. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Risk of preterm birth after prior term cesarean.先前足月剖宫产术后的早产风险。
BJOG. 2020 Apr;127(5):610-617. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16083. Epub 2020 Feb 24.