Doonan Robert James, Abdullah Abdullah, Steinmetz-Wood Samantha, Mekhaiel Sandra, Steinmetz Oren K, Obrand Daniel I, Corriveau Marc M, Mackenzie Kent S, Gill Heather L
Division of Vascular Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Division of Vascular Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.084. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established surgical intervention for stroke prevention in patients with carotid stenosis of all ages. However, the decision to proceed to operate in the elderly involves a more complicated risk-benefit assessment due in part to increased comorbidities and reduced life expectancy. Some studies suggest that CEA is more risky in the elderly with worse outcomes, whereas others have found no difference. Our objective was to evaluate and compare outcomes of CEA between elderly and younger patients at our institution.
All hospital charts were reviewed for consecutive patients undergoing CEA from the Jewish General Hospital and the Royal Victoria Hospital from October 2009 to December 2015. Primary outcomes were ipsilateral stroke, death, and restenosis at 30 days and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were cranial nerve injury, myocardial infarction (MI), hematoma, wound infection, cerebral hyperperfusion, and transient ischemic attacks within 30 days. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥80 years and <80 years.
A total of 361 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 70.2 ± 9.5 years (n = 247 [68.4%] male and n = 272 [75.8%] symptomatic). Elderly patients were more often symptomatic (93.8% vs. 71.6%, P < 0.0001) and had an increased length of stay (2.8 ± 5.3 vs. 1.6 ± 1.8, P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in primary outcomes between patients aged <80 years and ≥80 years, including 30-day stroke (1.7% vs. 0%), death (no deaths in either group), restenosis (8.8% vs. 12.3%), 1-year stroke (1.7% vs. 0%), death (0.7% vs. 0%), or restenosis (14.9% vs. 13.8%). However, elderly patients had significantly increased MI risk postoperatively (4.6% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.01). Other complications, including cranial nerve injury (3.7% in <80 years vs. 4.6% in the elderly group), were similar between the groups.
We found that CEA in the elderly does not have an increased risk of stroke or death up to one year postoperatively. However, the postoperative length of stay is increased and complicated by significantly more MIs, which should weigh into the decision of whether to perform CEA on an elderly patient.
