Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Södersjukhuset, Sweden.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Feb;35:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Peer-assessment in nursing education using an OSCE protocol is an increasing educational activity that complements that of teachers. However, little is known about how students' and teachers' assessments correspond. The study aimed to compare OSCE assessments made by student examiners and faculty examiners during examinations of clinical skills in undergraduate nursing education. Four cohorts of third-year nursing students participated between 2014 and 2016. The students underwent a clinical examination of the management of central venous catheters and totally implantable venous access devices. Students who performed the examinations were observed both by a faculty examiner and student examiner. Both observers used the same OSCE protocol for the assessment but independently. The OSCE protocols from both faculty and student examiners were reviewed and compared. Total agreement between the student and faculty examiner was reached in 127 of 135 (94%) paired protocols. The level of agreement was substantial with a kappa value of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.93). The conclusion was that the level of agreement between student and faculty examiners was high when using an OSCE protocol in clinical examinations of two different clinical skill tasks. The structured checklist (OSCE protocol) was easy to use for the student examiners despite the lack of experience or training in advance.
护理教育中的同伴评估是一种越来越多的教育活动,它是对教师评估的补充。然而,对于学生和教师的评估如何对应,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在比较学生考官和教师考官在本科护理教育中临床技能考试中的 OSCE 评估。2014 年至 2016 年期间,有四个三年级护理学生参加了这项研究。学生接受了中心静脉导管和完全植入式静脉通路装置管理的临床检查。进行检查的学生由一名教师考官和一名学生考官同时观察。两位观察者都使用相同的 OSCE 协议进行评估,但彼此独立。审查并比较了教师和学生考官的 OSCE 协议。在 135 对(94%)配对协议中,学生和教师考官之间达成了 127 次完全一致。具有 0.79(95%置信区间 0.65-0.93)的κ值表明,协议的一致性水平很高。结论是,在使用 OSCE 协议对两项不同临床技能任务进行临床检查时,学生考官和教师考官之间的一致性水平很高。尽管缺乏事先的经验或培训,结构化检查表(OSCE 协议)对学生考官来说也很容易使用。