• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知情的医患沟通在腰痛咨询中的应用 - GAP 试验的集群随机对照研究方案。

Well informed physician-patient communication in consultations on back pain - study protocol of the cluster randomized GAP trial.

机构信息

Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.

Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 25;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0925-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-019-0925-8
PMID:30803433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6388488/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Back pain is one of the most frequent causes of health-related work absence. In Germany, more than 70% of adults suffer from at least one back pain episode per annum. It has strong impact on health care costs and patients' quality of life. Patients increasingly seek health information on the internet. However, judging its trustworthiness is difficult. In addition, physicians who are being confronted with this type of information often experience it to complicate the physician-patient interaction. The GAP trial aims to develop, implement and evaluate an evidence-based, easy-to-understand and trustworthy internet information portal on lower back pain to be used by general practitioners and patients during and after the consultation. Effectiveness of GAP portal use compared to routine consultation on improving communication and informedness of both physicians and patients will be assessed. In addition, effects on health care costs and patients' days of sick leave will be evaluated.

METHODS

We will conduct a prospective multi-centre, cluster-randomized parallel group trial including 1500 patients and 150 recruiting general practitioners. The intervention group will have access to the GAP portal. The portal will contain brief guides for patients and physicians on how to improve the consultation as well as information on epidemiology, aetiology, symptoms, benefits and harms of treatment options for acute, sub-acute and chronic lower back pain. The GAP portal will be designed to be user-friendly and present information on back pain tailored for either patients or physicians in form of brief fact sheets, educative videos, info-graphics, animations and glossaries. Physicians and patients will assess their informedness and the physician-patient communication in consultations at baseline and at two time points after the consultations under investigation. Days of sick leave and health care costs related to back pain will be compared between control and intervention group using routine data of company health insurance funds.

DISCUSSION

The GAP-trial intends to improve the communication between physicians and their patients and the informedness of both groups. If proven beneficial, the evidence-based and user-friendly portal will be made accessible for all patients and health professionals in back pain care. Inclusion of further indications might be implemented and evaluated in the long term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00014279 (registered 27th of April 2018).

摘要

背景

背痛是导致与健康相关的缺勤最常见的原因之一。在德国,超过 70%的成年人每年至少会经历一次背痛。它对医疗保健成本和患者的生活质量有很大的影响。患者越来越多地在互联网上寻找健康信息。然而,判断其可信度是很困难的。此外,面对这种类型的信息,医生往往会觉得它使医患互动变得复杂。GAP 试验旨在开发、实施和评估一个基于证据的、易于理解和值得信赖的互联网下背痛信息门户,供全科医生和患者在咨询期间和之后使用。将评估 GAP 门户的使用与常规咨询相比,在改善医患双方的沟通和知情程度方面的效果。此外,还将评估对医疗保健成本和患者病假天数的影响。

方法

我们将进行一项前瞻性的多中心、集群随机平行组试验,包括 1500 名患者和 150 名招募的全科医生。干预组将可以使用 GAP 门户。该门户将包含针对患者和医生的简要指南,介绍如何改善咨询,以及关于急性、亚急性和慢性下背痛的流行病学、病因、症状、治疗选择的益处和危害的信息。GAP 门户将设计为用户友好,并以简短的事实表、教育视频、信息图表、动画和词汇表的形式为患者或医生提供针对背痛的信息。医生和患者将在基线和调查咨询后的两个时间点评估他们在咨询中的知情程度和医患沟通。将使用公司健康保险基金的常规数据比较对照组和干预组的病假天数和与背痛相关的医疗保健费用。

讨论

GAP 试验旨在改善医生与其患者之间的沟通以及两组患者的知情程度。如果被证明是有益的,那么这个基于证据和用户友好的门户将可供所有背痛护理的患者和卫生专业人员使用。在长期内,可以纳入进一步的适应症并进行评估。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心 DRKS00014279(2018 年 4 月 27 日注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0762/6388488/613db182fb67/12875_2019_925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0762/6388488/613db182fb67/12875_2019_925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0762/6388488/613db182fb67/12875_2019_925_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Well informed physician-patient communication in consultations on back pain - study protocol of the cluster randomized GAP trial.知情的医患沟通在腰痛咨询中的应用 - GAP 试验的集群随机对照研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 25;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0925-8.
2
Referrals for uncomplicated lower back pain: a cluster parallel randomised trial of patient-centred communication to improve the management of acute back pain in primary care. A study protocol.转诊治疗无并发症下腰痛:一项以患者为中心的沟通改善初级保健急性腰痛管理的群组平行随机试验。研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e027718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027718.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate a referral strategy for axial spondyloarthritis in young primary care patients with chronic low back pain; an impact study.一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估针对患有慢性下腰痛的年轻初级保健患者的轴性脊柱关节炎转诊策略;一项影响研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 12;17:278. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1132-6.
6
Early coordinated multidisciplinary intervention to prevent sickness absence and labour market exclusion in patients with low back pain: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.早期多学科协调干预以预防腰痛患者的病假和劳动力市场排斥:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 13;14:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-93.
7
Health coaching via an internet portal for primary care patients with chronic conditions: a randomized controlled trial.通过互联网门户为慢性病初级保健患者提供健康指导:一项随机对照试验。
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):41-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181844dd0.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.神经反射疗法治疗常规全科医疗中急性和慢性腰痛的有效性及成本效益分析:一项整群随机对照试验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1149-59. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00004.
9
MyBackPain-evaluation of an innovative consumer-focused website for low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.我的背痛——一个创新的以消费者为中心的腰痛网站评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 14;9(5):e027516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027516.
10
Comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees with different job relations on sick leave due to low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.比较多学科干预与简短干预对因腰痛休病假的不同工作关系员工的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4975-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Acceptance and Usability of an Independent, Noncommercial Search Engine for Medical Information: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study and User Behavior Tracking Analysis.评估一个独立的非商业性医学信息搜索引擎的可接受性和可用性:横断面问卷调查研究及用户行为跟踪分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 23;12:e56941. doi: 10.2196/56941.
2
The Acceptance, Usability, and Utility of a Web Portal for Back Pain as Recommended by Primary Care Physicians: Qualitative Interview Study With Patients.基层医疗医生推荐的腰痛网络门户的可接受性、可用性和实用性:对患者的定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 29;6(12):e38748. doi: 10.2196/38748.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision making and support for self-management: a rationale for change.共同决策与自我管理支持:变革的基本原理
Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun;3(2):117-120. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-117.
2
German translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).《健康素养问卷》(HLQ)的德语翻译、文化调适及效度验证
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172340. eCollection 2017.
3
Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions.
Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis.
医生与患者沟通评估的方差分量:概化理论分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252968. eCollection 2021.
4
Quality of life and objective functional impairment in lumbar spinal stenosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of moderators.生活质量和腰椎管狭窄症的客观功能障碍:系统评价和调节因素荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032314.
针对全科医生的肌肉骨骼疾病管理的专业干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD007495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007495.pub2.
4
Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.基层医疗临床医生遵循腰痛管理临床指南的障碍:定性研究的系统评价与元综合方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 21;5(4):e007265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007265.
5
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3.
6
On regression adjustment for the propensity score.关于倾向得分的回归调整。
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 15;33(23):4053-72. doi: 10.1002/sim.6207. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
8
The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).健康素养问卷(HLQ)的基础心理测量学发展和初步验证。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 16;13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-658.
9
Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.促进接受外科手术及其他侵入性医疗程序的患者实现知情同意的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
10
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.