• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于严重脑损伤后处于昏迷状态的患者的功能性磁共振成像研究的知情同意:在研究的社会效益和患者自主权之间取得平衡。

Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy.

机构信息

Medizinhistorisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):299-303. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104867. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2018-104867
PMID:30803985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6582739/
Abstract

Functional MRI shows promise as a candidate prognostication method in acutely comatose patients following severe brain injury. However, further research is needed before this technique becomes appropriate for clinical practice. Drawing on a clinical case, we investigate the process of obtaining informed consent for this kind of research and identify four ethical issues. After describing each issue, we propose potential solutions which would make a patient's participation in research compatible with her rights and interests. First, we defend the need for traditional proxy consent against two alternative approaches. Second, we examine the impact of the intensive care unit environment on the informed consent process. Third, we discuss the therapeutic misconception and its potential influence on informed consent. Finally, we deal with issues of timing in recruiting participants and related factors which may affect the risks of participation.

摘要

功能磁共振成像有望成为严重脑损伤后昏迷患者的候选预后方法。然而,在这项技术适合临床实践之前,还需要进一步的研究。通过一个临床案例,我们研究了获得这种研究知情同意的过程,并确定了四个伦理问题。在描述每个问题之后,我们提出了一些潜在的解决方案,以使患者参与研究符合她的权利和利益。首先,我们反对两种替代方法,为传统的代理同意辩护。其次,我们研究了重症监护病房环境对知情同意过程的影响。第三,我们讨论了治疗误解及其对知情同意的潜在影响。最后,我们处理了招募参与者的时间安排和可能影响参与风险的相关因素的问题。

相似文献

1
Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy.关于严重脑损伤后处于昏迷状态的患者的功能性磁共振成像研究的知情同意:在研究的社会效益和患者自主权之间取得平衡。
J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):299-303. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104867. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.面对治疗性误解时假定患者的自主性。
Bioethics. 2017 Nov;31(9):711-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12384. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Informed Consent, Therapeutic Misconception, and Unrealistic Optimism.知情同意、治疗性误解和不切实际的乐观主义。
Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(2):359-373. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0024.
4
The fair transaction model of informed consent: an alternative to autonomous authorization.知情同意的公平交易模式:自主授权的替代方案。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2011 Sep;21(3):201-18. doi: 10.1353/ken.2011.0013.
5
[Informed consent: going through the motions?].[知情同意:只是走过场?]
Harefuah. 2014 Feb;153(2):115-8, 125.
6
Dealing with Misconception in Biomedical Research.应对生物医学研究中的误解
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Dec;14(5):428-432. doi: 10.1177/1556264619831589.
7
Can informed consent go too far? Balancing consent and public benefit in research.知情同意会过度吗?平衡研究中的同意与公共利益。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.778645.
8
Clinical research before informed consent.知情同意前的临床研究。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun;24(2):141-57. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0009.
9
Ethical issues in research.研究中的伦理问题。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug;43:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.个体临床结果对试验参与者在未经同意情况下参与紧急研究的招募观点的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1740774516677276. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
From opt-out to opt-in consent for secondary use of medical data and residual biomaterial: An evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.从选择退出到选择加入同意将医疗数据和剩余生物材料用于二次使用:使用 RE-AIM 框架进行评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0299430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299430. eCollection 2024.
2
Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.意识障碍临床试验中的伦理考量
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):211. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020211.
3
The ethics of psychedelic research in disorders of consciousness.意识障碍中致幻剂研究的伦理问题。
Neurosci Conscious. 2019 Oct 9;2019(1):niz013. doi: 10.1093/nc/niz013. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting consciousness in coma: media framing of neuro-scientific research, hope, and the response of families with relatives in vegetative and minimally conscious states.昏迷状态下的意识报告:神经科学研究的媒体框架、希望以及亲属处于植物人和微意识状态的家庭的反应。
JOMEC J. 2013 Jun 1;3:10244. doi: 10.18573/j.2013.10244. eCollection 2013.
2
Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.面对治疗性误解时假定患者的自主性。
Bioethics. 2017 Nov;31(9):711-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12384. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Ethical considerations in functional magnetic resonance imaging research in acutely comatose patients.急性昏迷患者功能磁共振成像研究中的伦理考量
Brain. 2016 Jan;139(Pt 1):292-9. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv272. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
4
MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest.磁共振成像默认模式网络连接性与心肺复苏后的功能转归相关。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):348-57. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9953-3.
5
Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.提高研究知情同意过程中的理解:54 项随机对照试验中测试的干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 23;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.
6
Research recruitment practices and critically ill patients. A multicenter, cross-sectional study (the Consent Study).研究招募实践与重症患者。一项多中心、横断面研究(同意研究)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1537OC.
7
Obtaining surrogate consent for a minimal-risk research study in the intensive care unit setting.在重症监护病房环境中,为一项低风险研究获得替代同意。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):93-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774512464727. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
8
Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients.代理人决策制定者对危重症患者研究决策的态度。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2625-x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
9
Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.代决策者对危重病研究的实时观点:焦点小组参与者的发现。
Chest. 2012 Dec;142(6):1433-1439. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-3199.
10
Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients.昏迷患者默认模式网络功能连接的中断。
Neurology. 2012 Jan 17;78(3):175-81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823fcd61. Epub 2012 Jan 4.