School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, 639798, Singapore, Singapore.
Centre for Biomimetic Sensor Science, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Drive, 637553, Singapore, Singapore.
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38915-x.
As the physicochemical properties of drug delivery systems are governed not only by the material properties which they are compose of but by their size that they conform, it is crucial to determine the size and distribution of such systems with nanometer-scale precision. The standard technique used to measure the size distribution of nanometer-sized particles in suspension is dynamic light scattering (DLS). Recently, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) has been introduced to measure the diffusion coefficient of particles in a sample to determine their size distribution in relation to DLS results. Because DLS and NTA use identical physical characteristics to determine particle size but differ in the weighting of the distribution, NTA can be a good verification tool for DLS and vice versa. In this study, we evaluated two NTA data analysis methods based on maximum-likelihood estimation, namely finite track length adjustment (FTLA) and an iterative method, on monodisperse polystyrene beads and polydisperse vesicles by comparing the results with DLS. The NTA results from both methods agreed well with the mean size and relative variance values from DLS for monodisperse polystyrene standards. However, for the lipid vesicles prepared in various polydispersity conditions, the iterative method resulted in a better match with DLS than the FTLA method. Further, it was found that it is better to compare the native number-weighted NTA distribution with DLS, rather than its converted distribution weighted by intensity, as the variance of the converted NTA distribution deviates significantly from the DLS results.
由于药物输送系统的物理化学性质不仅由其组成的材料性质决定,还由其形态的大小决定,因此以纳米级精度确定此类系统的大小和分布至关重要。用于测量悬浮纳米颗粒粒径分布的标准技术是动态光散射(DLS)。最近,纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)已被引入以测量样品中颗粒的扩散系数,以确定其粒径分布与 DLS 结果的关系。由于 DLS 和 NTA 使用相同的物理特性来确定粒径,但在分布的权重上有所不同,因此 NTA 可以作为 DLS 的良好验证工具,反之亦然。在这项研究中,我们通过将结果与 DLS 进行比较,评估了两种基于最大似然估计的 NTA 数据分析方法,即有限轨迹长度调整(FTLA)和迭代方法,用于单分散聚苯乙烯珠和多分散囊泡。两种方法的 NTA 结果与 DLS 得出的单分散聚苯乙烯标准的平均粒径和相对方差值吻合良好。然而,对于在各种多分散性条件下制备的脂质囊泡,与 FTLA 方法相比,迭代方法与 DLS 的匹配更好。此外,研究发现,最好将原生的数权重 NTA 分布与 DLS 进行比较,而不是通过强度加权的转换 NTA 分布,因为转换后的 NTA 分布的方差与 DLS 结果有很大差异。