• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Additional benefit of minimally invasive surgery to improve functional outcomes after radical hysterectomy.微创手术在改善根治性子宫切除术后功能结局方面的额外益处。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e64. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e64.
2
The change in landscape after a new landmark is constructed: Radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer and Minimally Invasive Surgery.新地标建筑建成后的景观变化：早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术与微创手术
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.009.
3
Financial viewpoint of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: another disadvantage?早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的财务视角：另一个劣势？
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1464. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001794. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
4
Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.重新思考早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术后出现意外结果后的下一步措施。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e43. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e43. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Advances in laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer.腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌的进展。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Nov;143:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
6
What Is the Future of Radical Hysterectomy? Commentary on the Indication for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer ≤2 cm.根治性子宫切除术的未来何去何从？关于≤2cm宫颈癌微创手术指征的述评
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Jul;46(7):102242. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102242.
7
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).经阴道根治性子宫切除术：来自阿根廷意大利医院的肿瘤学结果分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):863-868. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000323.
8
Minimally-Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cancer of the Cervix: The Perspective of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists of Canada (GOC).子宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术：加拿大妇科肿瘤学家协会（GOC）的观点
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Feb;41(2):143-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.013.
9
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.对比微创根治性子宫切除术和传统开放性根治性子宫切除术在 Ib1 期-IIa2 期宫颈癌患者中的生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
10
Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.根治性子宫切除术：微创技术时代的疗效与安全性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery.微创外科改善了宫颈癌患者神经保留根治性子宫切除术的短期疗效：与开放性腹式手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e27. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e27. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.腹腔镜下保留神经的广泛子宫切除术与腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的临床疗效和膀胱功能障碍的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(3):417-426.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.宫颈癌传统手术与保留神经的根治性手术：一项荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):100-10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100.
4
Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.保留神经的宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的肿瘤学结局：一项系统评价
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):3033-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4377-7. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
5
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌：匹配队列研究的长期生存结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):903-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.腹腔镜与开腹手术用于子宫癌全面外科分期的比较：妇科肿瘤学组研究 LAP2。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5331-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
7
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer.腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术用于早期卵巢癌和输卵管癌手术分期的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;15(7):2012-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9893-2. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
8
Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy.保留神经的冈林式根治性子宫切除术的解剖学识别与功能结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.076.

Additional benefit of minimally invasive surgery to improve functional outcomes after radical hysterectomy.

作者信息

Park Jeong Yeol

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e64. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e64.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e64
PMID:30806046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6393644/
Abstract
摘要