• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较高剂量胰岛素与血管加压药或联合治疗在难治性普萘洛尔诱导心源性休克猪模型中的随机对照研究。

A randomized controlled study comparing high-dose insulin to vasopressors or combination therapy in a porcine model of refractory propranolol-induced cardiogenic shock.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital , Minneapolis , MN , USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital , St. Paul , MN , USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019 Nov;57(11):1073-1079. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1580372. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1080/15563650.2019.1580372
PMID:30806099
Abstract

Although cerebral perfusion (CP) is preserved across a wide range of mean arterial pressures (MAP) through cerebral-vascular autoregulation, the relationship between MAP and CP in refractory poison-induced cardiogenic shock (PICS) has never been studied. We compared the effects of therapies used in PICS: high-dose insulin (HDI), HDI plus norepinephrine (NE), and vasopressors alone (NE plus epinephrine (Epi)) on cerebral tissue oxygenation (PO). Fifteen swine were randomized to either HDI, HDI + NE, or NE + Epi. All animals received a propranolol infusion using an established model of toxicity. At primary toxicity (P), defined as a 25% reduction in heart rate (HR) multiplied by MAP, the HDI and HDI + NE groups received HDI and the NE + Epi group received NE. Once a sustained MAP < 55 mmHg was reached (P), the HDI group received saline (NS), the HDI + NE group received NE and the NE + Epi group received Epi until death or censoring. PO and hemodynamic parameters including MAP, cardiac output (CO) and central venous pressure (CVP) were measured every 10 minutes. Glucose and potassium were measured at predetermined intervals. Animals treated with HDI + NE maintained PO over time more than the HDI-alone group. Due to rapid hemodynamic collapse, we were unable to analyze PO data in the vasopressor only animals. Mean survival time was 1.9, 2.9 and 0.1 hours for the HDI, HDI + NE and NE + Epi groups, respectively. Survival time from P (sustained MAP <55 mmHg) to death or censoring was not different between HDI and HDI + NE groups. HDI + NE treatment was superior to HDI-alone at preserving PO when MAP < 55 mmHg. We were unable to compare the PO between the NE + Epi to the HDI or HDI + NE due to rapid decline in CO and death. If MAP is sustained at < 55 mmHg after maximizing HDI, adjunctive treatment with NE should be considered to preserve PO.

摘要

尽管通过脑血管自动调节,脑灌注 (CP) 在广泛的平均动脉压 (MAP) 范围内得以维持,但 MAP 与难治性中毒性心源性休克 (PICS) 中的 CP 之间的关系从未被研究过。我们比较了用于 PICS 的治疗方法的效果:高剂量胰岛素 (HDI)、HDI 加去甲肾上腺素 (NE) 和单独使用血管加压药 (NE 加肾上腺素 (Epi)) 对脑组织氧合 (PO) 的影响。15 头猪被随机分为 HDI、HDI+NE 或 NE+Epi 组。所有动物均接受了已建立的毒性模型中的普萘洛尔输注。在原发性毒性 (P) 时,定义为心率 (HR) 乘以 MAP 减少 25%,HDI 和 HDI+NE 组给予 HDI,NE+Epi 组给予 NE。一旦达到持续的 MAP<55mmHg(P),HDI 组给予生理盐水 (NS),HDI+NE 组给予 NE,NE+Epi 组给予 Epi,直至死亡或删失。每 10 分钟测量一次 PO 和包括 MAP、心输出量 (CO) 和中心静脉压 (CVP) 在内的血流动力学参数。每隔一定时间测量葡萄糖和钾。用 HDI+NE 治疗的动物随着时间的推移保持 PO 高于单独用 HDI 治疗的动物。由于血流动力学迅速崩溃,我们无法分析仅用血管加压药治疗的动物的 PO 数据。HDI、HDI+NE 和 NE+Epi 组的平均存活时间分别为 1.9、2.9 和 0.1 小时。从 P(持续 MAP<55mmHg)到死亡或删失的时间在 HDI 和 HDI+NE 组之间没有差异。当 MAP<55mmHg 时,HDI+NE 治疗在保持 PO 方面优于单独使用 HDI。由于 CO 迅速下降和死亡,我们无法将 NE+Epi 与 HDI 或 HDI+NE 之间的 PO 进行比较。如果在最大剂量使用 HDI 后 MAP 持续低于 55mmHg,则应考虑使用 NE 辅助治疗以维持 PO。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled study comparing high-dose insulin to vasopressors or combination therapy in a porcine model of refractory propranolol-induced cardiogenic shock.一项比较高剂量胰岛素与血管加压药或联合治疗在难治性普萘洛尔诱导心源性休克猪模型中的随机对照研究。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019 Nov;57(11):1073-1079. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1580372. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
2
A blinded, randomized, controlled trial of three doses of high-dose insulin in poison-induced cardiogenic shock.一项针对毒物诱导性心原性休克的三种高剂量胰岛素剂量的盲法、随机、对照试验。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 May;51(4):201-7. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.770152. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Use of a Porcine Model to Evaluate the Risks and Benefits of Vasopressors in Propranolol Poisoning.使用猪模型评估去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素在普萘洛尔中毒中的风险和获益。
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Apr;16(2):212-221. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00758-8. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
A Swine Model of Severe Propranolol Toxicity Permitting Direct Measurement of Brain Tissue Oxygenation.一种可用于直接测量脑组织氧合的重度普萘洛尔中毒猪模型。
J Med Toxicol. 2019 Jul;15(3):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00707-0. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of high-dose insulin in a porcine septic shock model.高剂量胰岛素对猪脓毒性休克模型的心血管和代谢影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):429-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00695.x.
6
Insulin-dependent rescue from cardiogenic shock is not mediated by phospholamban phosphorylation.胰岛素依赖性的心源性休克抢救并非由受磷蛋白磷酸化介导。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Apr;47(4):296-302. doi: 10.1080/15563650902870269.
7
Insulin versus vasopressin and epinephrine to treat beta-blocker toxicity.胰岛素与血管加压素和肾上腺素治疗β受体阻滞剂中毒的比较。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 May;45(4):396-401. doi: 10.1080/15563650701285412.
8
Addition of phenylephrine to high-dose insulin in dihydropyridine overdose does not improve outcome.二氢吡啶类药物过量时,在高剂量胰岛素中加入苯肾上腺素不能改善预后。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Oct;48(8):806-12. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2010.521753.
9
Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 10;72(2):173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.051.
10
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Initial Norepinephrine or Epinephrine for Hemodynamic Support After Return of Spontaneous Circulation.自主循环恢复后使用初始去甲肾上腺素或肾上腺素进行血流动力学支持的临床结果比较。
Shock. 2021 Dec 1;56(6):988-993. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001830.

引用本文的文献

1
Comment on "Vasopressor Use, Critical Care Management and Outcomes in Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity".关于《二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂中毒时血管升压药的使用、重症监护管理及预后》的评论
J Med Toxicol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s13181-025-01085-6.
2
Hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia and intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for the management of severe amlodipine toxicosis in a cat.高胰岛素血症/正常血糖及静脉输注脂肪乳剂疗法用于治疗猫严重氨氯地平中毒
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Dec 7;9(12):e05175. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5175. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiovascular Medications in a Normovolemic and Hemorrhaged Yorkshire-cross Swine Model.
血流动力学效应的心血管药物在一个等容和出血的约克郡杂交猪模型。
Comp Med. 2022 Feb 1;72(1):38-44. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000080. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
Massive metoprolol overdose requiring ECMO: brief review of the evidence behind recommended treatments.大量美托洛尔过量需体外膜肺氧合治疗:推荐治疗背后证据的简要回顾
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 May 5;14(5):e232130. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232130.
5
Use of a Porcine Model to Evaluate the Risks and Benefits of Vasopressors in Propranolol Poisoning.使用猪模型评估去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素在普萘洛尔中毒中的风险和获益。
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Apr;16(2):212-221. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00758-8. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Development and Feasibility of a Porcine Model of Amlodipine Toxicity.开发和可行性研究的氨氯地平中毒的猪模型。
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Jan;16(1):61-66. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00721-2. Epub 2019 Aug 5.