Maerki S C, Luft H S, Hunt S S
Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):148-58. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198602000-00006.
A growing number of researchers have demonstrated an inverse relation between the number of patients treated with specific diagnoses or procedures in a hospital and subsequent adverse outcomes. Such findings support the notion that policies should be explored to concentrate patients in selected hospitals to reduce preventable patient mortality or morbidity. The authors used data from 15 diagnoses and procedures demonstrating an inverse relation between volume and mortality to explore the different implications of regionalization policies across categories of patients. In some instances, concentrating patients in hospitals with high volumes of such patients could avert more than 60% of all deaths. For some procedures or diagnoses, however, such mortality savings are either medically infeasible because of the emergency nature of the problem or logistically impossible because of the extent of regionalization implied.
越来越多的研究人员已经证明,医院中接受特定诊断或治疗的患者数量与随后的不良后果之间存在反比关系。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即应该探索相关政策,将患者集中在选定的医院,以降低可预防的患者死亡率或发病率。作者使用了来自15种诊断和治疗的数据,这些数据表明治疗量与死亡率之间存在反比关系,以探讨区域化政策对不同类别患者的不同影响。在某些情况下,将患者集中在拥有大量此类患者的医院,可以避免超过60%的死亡。然而,对于某些治疗或诊断,由于问题的紧急性质,这种死亡率的降低在医学上是不可行的,或者由于所暗示的区域化程度,在后勤上是不可能的。