• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心源性休克患者在心脏导管室的机械循环支持

Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Ryan Matt, Briceno Natalia, Perera Divaka

机构信息

School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2019 Mar;49(3):197-213. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0443.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2018.0443
PMID:30808071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6393319/
Abstract

Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the currently available devices for treating shock, their physiological effects and the evidence base for their use in practice. We subsequently look ahead within this developing field, including new devices and novel indications for established technology.

摘要

尽管急性血管重建技术有所发展,但心源性休克的死亡率仍保持在50%左右。长期以来,机械循环支持设备一直有望改善休克患者的预后,但尚未有高质量的获益证据。在本文中,我们回顾了目前可用于治疗休克的设备、它们的生理效应以及在实际应用中的证据基础。随后,我们展望了这一不断发展的领域,包括新设备和现有技术的新适应症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/49072b5ba981/kcj-49-197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a2059e140e70/kcj-49-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/619480255685/kcj-49-197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a9d8395325cf/kcj-49-197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a7af230839d7/kcj-49-197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/b8d5d3a8c7f2/kcj-49-197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/49072b5ba981/kcj-49-197-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a2059e140e70/kcj-49-197-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/619480255685/kcj-49-197-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a9d8395325cf/kcj-49-197-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/a7af230839d7/kcj-49-197-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/b8d5d3a8c7f2/kcj-49-197-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c88/6393319/49072b5ba981/kcj-49-197-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克患者在心脏导管室的机械循环支持
Korean Circ J. 2019 Mar;49(3):197-213. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0443.
2
Differential Prognostic Implications of Vasoactive Inotropic Score for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock According to Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support.根据机械循环支持的使用情况,血管活性正性肌力评分对合并心源性休克的急性心肌梗死患者的预后影响的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):770-780. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004815.
3
Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.用于心源性休克的先进经皮机械循环支持装置
Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1922-1929. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002676.
4
Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in India.印度用于心源性休克的急性机械循环支持
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;39(Suppl 1):47-62. doi: 10.1007/s12055-023-01530-7. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
5
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.
6
The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.血管内机械循环支持在心原性休克和高危冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用日益增加:考虑因素和挑战。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;19(2):151-164. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1863147. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
[Reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock].[心源性休克患者的再灌注治疗与机械循环支持]
Herz. 1999 Oct;24(6):448-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03044431.
8
Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence?审视静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的作用:临床实践是否超越了证据?
Circulation. 2024 Mar 26;149(13):1033-1052. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067087. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
9
Cardiac ECMO: changing role in times of Impella and ventricular assist devices?体外膜肺氧合(ECMO):在心梗机械辅助装置(Impella)和心室辅助装置时代的作用变化?
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Jul;119(Suppl 2):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01121-3. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
10
Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克的发病率、病因、机械循环支持的使用及死亡率的时间趋势
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1295-1303. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13202. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial.主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克:随机对照IABP-SHOCK II试验的6年长期结果
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):395-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
2
Unloading of the Left Ventricle During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock.心肺复苏期间左心室在体循环外膜肺氧合治疗中的卸载。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;6(12):1035-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.09.009.
3
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后应用 MANTA 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置的倾向性匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1558-e1565. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00769.
4
Outcomes of patients with right ventricular failure requiring short-term hemodynamic support with the Impella RP device.使用 Impella RP 装置进行短期血液动力学支持的右心衰竭患者的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Dec;37(12):1448-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Nonroutine Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction With Successful and Unsuccessful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.非计划性使用主动脉内球囊反搏在心肌梗死合并心原性休克中的应用:初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功和失败的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 24;11(18):1885-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.030.
6
Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device.对 15259 例美国急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克(AMICS)患者应用 Impella 装置支持的结果分析。
Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
Insertion of the Impella via the axillary artery for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.经腋动脉置入Impella用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):540-544. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.016. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的 PCI 策略。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2419-2432. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710261. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
10
Use of a percutaneous temporary circulatory support device as a bridge to decision during acute decompensation of advanced heart failure.使用经皮临时循环支持装置作为急性心力衰竭失代偿期决策的桥梁。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jan;37(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Sep 30.