Department of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences - Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 25;9(2):e024424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024424.
There is no definitive cure for Dupuytren disease (DD), and recurrence of finger contractures after treatment is common. Surgical fasciectomy is considered the standard treatment method for recurrence, although associated with a high incidence of complications. Collagenase injection, a non-surgical treatment option, has been shown to be a safe and effective method; however, most studies regarding collagenase have involved first-time treatment. Collagenase efficacy in patients with recurrent DD beyond the immediate effect has not yet been determined. The aim of our study is to compare surgical fasciectomy and collagenase injection in treating recurrent DD.
The study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria are recurrence of DD in one or more fingers after previous treatment with fasciectomy or collagenase injection, a passive extension deficit ≥30° in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and/or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and a palpable cord causing the recurrent contracture. A total of 56 patients will be randomised to either surgical fasciectomy or collagenase injection. A hand therapist blinded to patients' group allocation will measure range of motion at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months. The primary outcomes are the total active extension deficit (MCP plus PIP) at 3 months and the proportion of patients with contracture worsening ≥20° in the treated finger joint at 2 years compared with 3 months. The secondary outcomes include changes in total active motion, active and passive extension deficit from baseline up to 5 years, scores on patient-reported outcome measures, adverse events and costs of treatment.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Lund University, Sweden(2017/623). The trial will be conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000. The results of the trial will be disseminated as published articles in peer-reviewed journals.
NCT03406338; Pre-results.
目前尚无针对掌腱膜挛缩症 (Dupuytren disease, DD) 的明确治愈方法,且治疗后手指挛缩的复发较为常见。外科筋膜切除术被认为是治疗复发的标准方法,但该方法与高并发症发生率相关。胶原酶注射作为一种非手术治疗选择,已被证实是一种安全有效的方法,但大多数关于胶原酶的研究都涉及首次治疗。胶原酶在 DD 复发患者中的疗效,超出即时效果,尚未得到确定。本研究旨在比较外科筋膜切除术和胶原酶注射治疗复发性 DD。
该研究为单中心随机对照试验。纳入标准为先前接受筋膜切除术或胶原酶注射治疗后,一个或多个手指出现 DD 复发,掌指关节 (metacarpophalangeal, MCP) 和/或近侧指间关节 (proximal interphalangeal, PIP) 被动伸展度缺失≥30°,且可触及导致复发挛缩的条索状组织。共有 56 例患者将被随机分为外科筋膜切除术组或胶原酶注射组。一位对手部治疗师对患者分组情况不知情的手部治疗师将在基线、3 个月、12 个月、24 个月和 60 个月时测量活动范围。主要结局为 3 个月时的总主动伸展度缺失(MCP 加 PIP),以及与 3 个月相比,2 年内治疗手指关节挛缩恶化≥20°的患者比例。次要结局包括从基线到 5 年内总主动运动、主动和被动伸展度缺失的变化、患者报告结局测量的评分、不良事件和治疗费用。
伦德大学地区伦理审查委员会(瑞典)已批准本研究(2017/623)。该试验将根据 1975 年修订的《赫尔辛基宣言》进行。试验结果将作为发表在同行评议期刊上的文章进行传播。
NCT03406338;预结果。