Suppr超能文献

社区对合适的急救护理来源的认知。

Community perceptions of appropriate sources of emergency care.

作者信息

Lumpkin J R, Glower J J, Fineberg H, Jekel J

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Feb;15(2):191-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80020-8.

Abstract

Two hundred eighteen residents in a suburban community northwest of Chicago were interviewed using standard telephone survey techniques. Respondents lived in an area served by two hospitals and two freestanding emergency centers (FECs) that had been in operation for three years prior to the survey. Those surveyed were asked to react to three common medical emergencies of graded levels of severity, small laceration, injured ankle, and myocardial infarction, to identify self-referral patterns of this community. Respondents were questioned about their knowledge and perception of the FECs and their hours of operation. Approximately 66.5% of the sample population was aware of the existence of these two centers. Fifty-four percent to 85.5% of respondents did not view these facilities as appropriate centers for the treatment of major emergencies. Only 58.3% (at 6:00 PM) and 63.3% (at 3:00 AM) of those surveyed would activate the emergency medical services system for a suspected myocardial infarction. Respondents made choices that would have delayed definitive care, including going to an FEC. Of those who thought they knew the hours of operation of the FECs, 65% believed these facilities were open 24 hours a day when, in fact, they were not.

摘要

采用标准电话调查技术,对芝加哥西北郊区社区的218名居民进行了访谈。受访者居住在一个由两家医院和两家独立急救中心(FEC)提供服务的区域,这两家急救中心在调查前已运营三年。调查对象被要求对三种严重程度不同的常见医疗紧急情况做出反应,即小伤口、脚踝受伤和心肌梗死,以确定该社区的自我转诊模式。受访者被问及他们对FEC的了解和认知以及其运营时间。大约66.5%的样本人口知道这两个中心的存在。54%至85.5%的受访者不认为这些设施是治疗重大紧急情况的合适场所。只有58.3%(下午6点时)和63.3%(凌晨3点时)的受访者会为疑似心肌梗死启动紧急医疗服务系统。受访者做出的选择会延误确定性治疗,包括前往FEC。在那些认为自己知道FEC运营时间的人中,65%认为这些设施每天24小时开放,而实际上并非如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验