Camiolo S M, Greco W R
Cancer Res. 1986 Apr;46(4 Pt 1):1788-94.
Plasminogen activators are enzymes which convert the zymogen to plasmin, the physiological enzyme for dissolving fibrin. There are two different physiological activator enzymes, urokinase (UK) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA, also known as vascular activator). The most striking difference in the behavior of the two activators is the ability of fibrin to augment the activity of t-PA but not of UK. Since tumor and normal tissues have been shown to contain different ratios of UK:t-PA, it can be anticipated that their comparative activator activities measured with fibrinolytic assays would yield different results from those measured with non-fibrin tests. This study was designed to test the validity of earlier conclusions that: (a) the measured activity of t-PA is augmented in fibrinolytic assays when compared with a non-fibrin assay based on azocaseinolysis; and (b) this difference could explain the failure of some laboratories using fibrinolytic assays to detect a difference in activator activity between tumor and normal tissues or to find more activity in the normal tissue. Azocaseinolytic and fibrinolytic (fibrin plate) assays were used to measure activator activity in a series of 14 normal-tumor tissue pairs. Using azocasein tests, cancer tissues were found to contain significantly higher median activities than normal tissues [Wilcoxon test, P less than 0.05; 13.8 versus 3.7 Committee on Thrombolytic Agents (CTA) units/g tissue, respectively], whereas no significant difference was found with fibrin assays (43.5 versus 69.0 CTA units/g tissue, respectively). Of total activator activity, the median percentage of UK was significantly higher in tumor (95%) than in normal tissue (58%). In addition, using azocaseinolysis it was found that the median UK activity was significantly higher in tumor (12.1 CTA units/g) relative to normal (3.51 CTA units/g) tissues, whereas no difference was found for t-PA. To explain these results in tumor and normal tissues, a mathematical model was derived to describe the difference between azocasein and fibrin assays for both purified plasminogen activator enzymes and activator enzymes in tissue extracts. The model fits the data well, confirming in a quantitative manner the hypotheses of the study. In addition, the study revealed that the azocaseinolytic assay was able to measure the full potential activator activity of purified pro-urokinase enzyme. Pro-urokinase activity could not be measured with standard fibrinolytic assays. These results show the importance of selection and interpretation of plasminogen activator assays in studies dealing with malignant transformation.
纤溶酶原激活剂是将酶原转化为纤溶酶的酶,纤溶酶是溶解纤维蛋白的生理性酶。有两种不同的生理性激活酶,即尿激酶(UK)和组织纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA,也称为血管激活剂)。这两种激活剂行为上最显著的差异是纤维蛋白增强t-PA活性的能力,而对UK则无此作用。由于已证明肿瘤组织和正常组织中UK与t-PA的比例不同,可以预期,用纤维蛋白溶解试验测定它们的相对激活剂活性会得出与非纤维蛋白试验不同的结果。本研究旨在检验早期结论的正确性,这些结论为:(a)与基于偶氮酪蛋白溶解的非纤维蛋白试验相比,在纤维蛋白溶解试验中测定的t-PA活性会增强;(b)这种差异可以解释一些使用纤维蛋白溶解试验的实验室未能检测到肿瘤组织和正常组织之间激活剂活性差异或在正常组织中发现更多活性的原因。采用偶氮酪蛋白溶解试验和纤维蛋白溶解(纤维蛋白平板)试验测定了14对正常-肿瘤组织中的激活剂活性。使用偶氮酪蛋白试验发现,癌组织的中位活性显著高于正常组织[Wilcoxon检验,P<0.05;分别为13.8和3.7溶栓剂委员会(CTA)单位/克组织],而纤维蛋白试验未发现显著差异(分别为43.5和69.0 CTA单位/克组织)。在总激活剂活性中,UK的中位百分比在肿瘤组织(95%)中显著高于正常组织(58%)。此外,使用偶氮酪蛋白溶解试验发现,肿瘤组织(12.1 CTA单位/克)中UK的中位活性相对于正常组织(3.51 CTA单位/克)显著更高,而t-PA则无差异。为了解释肿瘤组织和正常组织中的这些结果,推导了一个数学模型来描述纯化的纤溶酶原激活剂酶和组织提取物中的激活剂酶在偶氮酪蛋白试验和纤维蛋白试验之间的差异。该模型与数据拟合良好,从定量角度证实了该研究的假设。此外,该研究还表明,偶氮酪蛋白溶解试验能够测定纯化的尿激酶原酶的全部潜在激活剂活性。标准纤维蛋白溶解试验无法测定尿激酶原活性。这些结果表明在涉及恶性转化的研究中选择和解释纤溶酶原激活剂试验的重要性。