Venuraju Shreenidhi, Jeevarethinam Anand, Mehta Vishal Shahil, Ruano Sherezade, Dumo Alain, Nair Devaki, Rosenthal Miranda, Darko Daniel, Cohen Mark, Rakhit Roby, Lahiri Avijit
1 Bedford Hospital, Bedford, United Kingdom.
2 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angiology. 2019 Aug;70(7):613-620. doi: 10.1177/0003319719833265. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Endothelial dysfunction is common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with atherosclerotic disease. This study aimed to determine prognostic factors for endothelial dysfunction and identify relationships between reactive hyperemia index (RHI) score, clinically relevant coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with T2DM. Endothelial function was assessed using peripheral arterial tonometry and correlated with patient characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes during a median follow-up of 22.8 months. Among 235 patients with a median duration of T2DM of 13 years, mean (standard deviation) RHI score was 2.00 (0.76). Serum low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels positively ( = .004) and negatively ( = .02) predicted RHI score, respectively. Median coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was 109 Agatston units, but no correlation between CAC and RHI scores was observed. The RHI score did not predict the number or severity of coronary plaques identified using computed tomography coronary angiography. Additionally, there was no association between RHI score and the risk of an MACE during follow-up. Overall, endothelial function was not predictive of CAC score, extent, and severity of coronary plaque or MACEs and did not demonstrate utility in cardiovascular risk stratifying patients with T2DM.
内皮功能障碍在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中很常见,并且与动脉粥样硬化疾病相关。本研究旨在确定内皮功能障碍的预后因素,并确定T2DM患者的反应性充血指数(RHI)评分、临床相关冠状动脉疾病(狭窄>50%)和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系。使用外周动脉张力测量法评估内皮功能,并在中位随访22.8个月期间将其与患者特征和心血管结局相关联。在235例T2DM中位病程为13年的患者中,平均(标准差)RHI评分为2.00(0.76)。血清低密度和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平分别正向(P = .004)和负向(P = .02)预测RHI评分。冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分中位数为109阿加斯顿单位,但未观察到CAC与RHI评分之间存在相关性。RHI评分不能预测使用计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影确定的冠状动脉斑块数量或严重程度。此外,RHI评分与随访期间MACE风险之间无关联。总体而言,内皮功能不能预测CAC评分、冠状动脉斑块的范围和严重程度或MACE,并且在对T2DM患者进行心血管风险分层中未显示出实用性。