Westat, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jun 1;70(6):488-498. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800464. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
A systematic review of studies of individual placement and support (IPS) for populations other than those with serious mental illness was conducted.
The authors searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) for studies of IPS and modified IPS. Eligibility criteria for the systematic review included randomized controlled trials with prospective data collection on competitive employment rate and at least 10 study participants from a well-defined population other than people with serious mental illness. Results were compiled for competitive employment rates, IPS fidelity, and other outcomes.
Three clinical groups other than people with serious mental illness have been studied: people with psychiatric disorders other than serious mental illness, people with substance use disorders, and people with musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. Nine controlled trials with a total of 2,902 participants included six trials with people who had psychiatric disorders other than serious mental illness, two with people who had substance use disorders, and one with people who had spinal cord injuries. In eight studies, results for competitive employment rates significantly favored IPS. Meta-analysis yielded an overall weighted odds ratio of 2.23 (95% confidence interval=1.53-3.24, p<.001). Findings for other employment outcomes also favored IPS, but findings on symptom reduction and quality of life were inconsistent. The strongest (and only replicated) findings were for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methodological limitations included small samples, major modifications to IPS fidelity, and short follow-up periods.
IPS, often with modifications, is a promising employment intervention for several populations in addition to people with serious mental illnesses. The strongest evidence pertains to veterans with PTSD. IPS should be offered to these veterans. Research on other populations, including people with anxiety, depression, substance use disorder, musculoskeletal or neurological conditions, or pain syndromes, needs development, amplification, and replication.
对个体安置和支持(IPS)应用于除严重精神疾病患者以外的人群的研究进行系统综述。
作者检索了三个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus)中关于 IPS 和改良 IPS 的研究。系统综述的纳入标准为前瞻性收集竞争就业率数据的随机对照试验,且研究对象为除严重精神疾病患者以外的明确界定人群,人数不少于 10 例。结果汇总为竞争就业率、IPS 保真度和其他结局。
除严重精神疾病患者以外的 3 个临床人群得到了研究:精神障碍但非严重精神疾病患者、物质使用障碍患者和肌肉骨骼或神经疾病患者。纳入了 9 项共 2902 名参与者的对照试验,其中 6 项研究对象为精神障碍但非严重精神疾病患者,2 项为物质使用障碍患者,1 项为脊髓损伤患者。在 8 项研究中,IPS 的竞争就业率结果显著优于对照组。荟萃分析得出的总加权优势比为 2.23(95%置信区间 1.53-3.24,p<.001)。其他就业结局也有利于 IPS,但症状缓解和生活质量的结果不一致。最强(且仅被重复)的发现是针对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人。方法学局限性包括样本量小、IPS 保真度的重大修改以及随访时间短。
除严重精神疾病患者以外,IPS 经常需要修改,是几种人群的有前途的就业干预措施。最强的证据涉及 PTSD 的退伍军人。应该向这些退伍军人提供 IPS。需要进一步开发、放大和复制针对其他人群(包括焦虑、抑郁、物质使用障碍、肌肉骨骼或神经疾病或疼痛综合征)的研究。