• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainty on Risk Prediction: Towards More Robust Prediction Models.评估不确定性对风险预测的影响:迈向更稳健的预测模型
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1461-1470. eCollection 2018.
2
Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.40000 名澳大利亚女性的 NCI 乳腺癌风险评估工具( Gail 模型)前瞻性验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1084-x.
3
A new analytical framework for missing data imputation and classification with uncertainty: Missing data imputation and heart failure readmission prediction.一种具有不确定性的缺失数据插补和分类的新分析框架:缺失数据插补和心力衰竭再入院预测。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0237724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237724. eCollection 2020.
4
5
Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.将降低不确定性的成本与用于场地污染修复决策的风险评估模型的选择相结合。
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Mar 6;141(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.096. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
6
Two approaches to incorporate clinical data uncertainty into multiple criteria decision analysis for benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products.两种方法将临床数据不确定性纳入药物获益-风险评估的多准则决策分析中。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):619-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Conformal Regression for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling-Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty.定量构效关系建模的保形回归——量化预测不确定性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 May 29;58(5):1132-1140. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00054. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: lessons from a complex salmon model.应对生态系统模型中的不确定性:复杂鲑鱼模型的启示。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Mar;20(2):465-82. doi: 10.1890/08-0625.1.
9
Uncertainty and the decision maker: assessing and managing the risk of undesirable outcomes.
Health Econ. 2013 Nov;22(11):1287-94. doi: 10.1002/hec.2883. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
10
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

1
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Translating risk into action.临床中的多基因风险评分:将风险转化为行动。
HGG Adv. 2021 Jul 28;2(4):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100047. eCollection 2021 Oct 14.
2
Using Sequential Decision Making to Improve Lung Cancer Screening Performance.运用序贯决策制定来提高肺癌筛查性能。
IEEE Access. 2019;7:119403-119419. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935763. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Missing laboratory results data in electronic health databases: implications for monitoring diabetes risk.电子健康数据库中缺失的实验室检查结果数据:对监测糖尿病风险的影响
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jan;6(1):25-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
2
Improving the radiologist-CAD interaction: designing for appropriate trust.提高放射科医生与 CAD 系统的交互效率:设计应考虑适当的信任度。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Feb;70(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement.患者满意度调查作为提高质量的一种工具。
Oman Med J. 2014 Jan;29(1):3-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.02.
4
Personalized estimates of breast cancer risk in clinical practice and public health.临床实践和公共卫生中的乳腺癌个体化风险评估。
Stat Med. 2011 May 10;30(10):1090-104. doi: 10.1002/sim.4187. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors.不确定性沟通与个体化癌症风险估计:影响因素及效果。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):354-66. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10371830. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
6
Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.重新思考乳腺癌和前列腺癌的筛查
JAMA. 2009 Oct 21;302(15):1685-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498.
7
Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.流行病学和临床研究中缺失数据的多重填补:潜力与陷阱
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
8
NHS goes to the PROMS.英国国家医疗服务体系采用患者报告结局指标。
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1464-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39618.627951.80.
9
Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.算术技能以及风险效益信息的沟通、理解和使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):741-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741.
10
Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information.通过呈现动态系统置信信息来支持信任校准和决策辅助工具的有效使用。
Hum Factors. 2006 Winter;48(4):656-65. doi: 10.1518/001872006779166334.

评估不确定性对风险预测的影响:迈向更稳健的预测模型

Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainty on Risk Prediction: Towards More Robust Prediction Models.

作者信息

Petousis Panayiotis, Naeim Arash, Mosleh Ali, Hsu William

机构信息

Medical Imaging & Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences and Bioengineering.

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1461-1470. eCollection 2018.

PMID:30815191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6371325/
Abstract

Risk prediction models are crucial for assessing the pretest probability of cancer and are applied to stratify patient management strategies. These models are frequently based on multivariate regression analysis, requiring that all risk factors be specified, and do not convey the confidence in their predictions. We present a framework for uncertainty analysis that accounts for variability in input values. Uncertain or missing values are replaced with a range of plausible values. These ranges are used to compute individualized risk confidence intervals. We demonstrate our approach using the Gail model to evaluate the impact of uncertainty on management decisions. Up to 13% of cases (uncertain) had a risk interval that falls within the decision threshold (e.g., 1.67% 5-year absolute risk). A small number of cases changed from low- to high-risk when missing values were present. Our analysis underscores the need for better communication of input assumptions that influence the resulting predictions.

摘要

风险预测模型对于评估癌症的检测前概率至关重要,并应用于对患者管理策略进行分层。这些模型通常基于多变量回归分析,要求指定所有风险因素,并且无法传达其预测的置信度。我们提出了一个不确定性分析框架,该框架考虑了输入值的变异性。不确定或缺失的值将被一系列合理的值所取代。这些范围用于计算个体化风险置信区间。我们使用盖尔模型展示了我们的方法,以评估不确定性对管理决策的影响。高达13%的病例(不确定)的风险区间落在决策阈值内(例如,5年绝对风险为1.67%)。当存在缺失值时,少数病例从低风险变为高风险。我们的分析强调了更好地传达影响最终预测的输入假设的必要性。