• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康数据库中缺失的实验室检查结果数据:对监测糖尿病风险的影响

Missing laboratory results data in electronic health databases: implications for monitoring diabetes risk.

作者信息

Flory James H, Roy Jason, Gagne Joshua J, Haynes Kevin, Herrinton Lisa, Lu Christine, Patorno Elisabetta, Shoaibi Azadeh, Raebel Marsha A

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 9103, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jan;6(1):25-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2016-0033
PMID:27935320
Abstract

AIM

Laboratory test (lab) results may be useful to detect incident diabetes in electronic health record and claims-based studies.

RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: Using the Mini-Sentinel distributed database, we assessed the value of lab results added to diagnosis codes and dispensing claims to identify incident diabetes.

RESULTS

Inclusion of lab results increased the number of diabetes outcomes identified by 21%. In settings where capture of lab results was relatively complete, the absence of lab results was associated with implausibly low rates of the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Lab results can increase sensitivity of algorithms for detecting diabetes, and missing lab results are associated with much lower rates of diabetes ascertainment regardless of algorithm. Patterns of missing lab results may identify ascertainment bias.

摘要

目的

在基于电子健康记录和索赔的研究中,实验室检查(实验室)结果可能有助于检测新发糖尿病。

研究设计与方法

利用Mini-Sentinel分布式数据库,我们评估了添加到诊断代码和配药索赔中的实验室结果对识别新发糖尿病的价值。

结果

纳入实验室结果使识别出的糖尿病结局数量增加了21%。在实验室结果获取相对完整的情况下,缺乏实验室结果与该结局发生率低得不合理相关。

结论

实验室结果可提高糖尿病检测算法的敏感性,且无论采用何种算法,缺失的实验室结果都与糖尿病确诊率低得多相关。实验室结果缺失模式可能识别出确诊偏倚。

相似文献

1
Missing laboratory results data in electronic health databases: implications for monitoring diabetes risk.电子健康数据库中缺失的实验室检查结果数据:对监测糖尿病风险的影响
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jan;6(1):25-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
2
Validation of claims-based algorithms for gout flares.基于索赔的痛风发作算法的验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):820-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.4044. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Identifying health outcomes in healthcare databases.在医疗保健数据库中识别健康结果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):1009-16. doi: 10.1002/pds.3856. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
Validation of methods for assessing cardiovascular disease using electronic health data in a cohort of Veterans with diabetes.在一组患有糖尿病的退伍军人中,使用电子健康数据评估心血管疾病方法的验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):467-71. doi: 10.1002/pds.3921. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
5
Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.在澳大利亚医疗服务利用数据库中识别结直肠癌和肺癌新发病例:一项验证研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0417-5.
6
A Comparative Assessment of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership and Mini-Sentinel Common Data Models and Analytics: Implications for Active Drug Safety Surveillance.观察性医学转归合作组织与Mini-Sentinel公共数据模型及分析的比较评估:对主动药物安全性监测的启示
Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;38(8):749-65. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0297-5.
7
Identifying patients with diabetes and the earliest date of diagnosis in real time: an electronic health record case-finding algorithm.实时识别糖尿病患者和最早诊断日期:一种电子健康记录病例发现算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 1;13:81. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-81.
8
Comparison of electronic laboratory reports, administrative claims, and electronic health record data for acute viral hepatitis surveillance.电子实验室报告、行政索赔与电子健康记录数据在急性病毒性肝炎监测中的比较。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):209-14. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31821f2d73.
9
Can statistical linkage of missing variables reduce bias in treatment effect estimates in comparative effectiveness research studies?在比较效果研究中,缺失变量的统计关联能否减少治疗效果估计中的偏差?
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):455-63. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.23. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
Using linked electronic data to validate algorithms for health outcomes in administrative databases.利用关联电子数据验证行政数据库中健康结果的算法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):359-66. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in diabetes monitoring and control among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples attending general practice in urban and rural locations in Australia: a repeated cross-sectional study using data from a national general practice database (MedicineInsight).澳大利亚城乡地区原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民在全科医疗就诊时的糖尿病监测与控制趋势:一项利用国家全科医疗数据库(医学洞察)数据的重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):e093031. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093031.
2
Diabetes mellitus monitoring and control among adults in Australian general practice: a national retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚全科医疗中成年人的糖尿病监测和控制:一项全国回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e069875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069875.
3
Designing and conducting adaptive trials to evaluate interventions in health services and implementation research: practical considerations.
设计和开展适应性试验以评估卫生服务干预措施及实施研究:实际考量
BMJ Med. 2022;1(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000158. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Measurement error and misclassification in electronic medical records: methods to mitigate bias.电子病历中的测量误差和错误分类:减轻偏差的方法。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Dec;5(4):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0164-x. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Leveraging the Capabilities of the FDA's Sentinel System To Improve Kidney Care.利用 FDA 的 Sentinel 系统的功能来改善肾脏护理。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2506-2516. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020040526. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Technology-Enabled Outreach to Patients Taking High-Risk Medications Reduces a Quality Gap in Completion of Clinical Laboratory Testing.利用技术向服用高风险药物的患者提供服务,可缩小临床实验室检测完成情况方面的质量差距。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Feb;23(1):3-11. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0033. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainty on Risk Prediction: Towards More Robust Prediction Models.评估不确定性对风险预测的影响:迈向更稳健的预测模型
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1461-1470. eCollection 2018.
8
Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process.利用数据仓库和结构化多学科流程识别分析前和分析后实验室质量差距
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Apr;143(4):518-524. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
A Bayesian latent class approach for EHR-based phenotyping.基于电子健康记录的表型分析的贝叶斯潜在类别方法。
Stat Med. 2019 Jan 15;38(1):74-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.7953. Epub 2018 Sep 3.