• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者亲属中糖尿病的筛查率较低。

Low Screening Rates for Diabetes Mellitus Among Family Members of Affected Relatives.

作者信息

Polubriaginof Fernanda C G, Shang Ning, Hripcsak George, Tatonetti Nicholas P, Vawdrey David K

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Value Institute, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1471-1477. eCollection 2018.

PMID:30815192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6371358/
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and abnormal blood glucose is an important risk factor. Delayed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus can increase patients' morbidity. In an urban academic medical center with a large clinical data warehouse, we used a novel algorithm to identify 56,794 family members of diabetic patients that were eligible for disease screening. We found that 30.6% of patients did not receive diabetes screening as recommended by current guidelines. Further, our analysis showed that having more than one family member affected and being a female were important contributors to being screened for diabetes mellitus. This study demonstrates that informatics methods applied to electronic health record data can be used to identify patients at risk for disease development, and therefore support clinical care.

摘要

心血管疾病是美国的主要死因,而血糖异常是一个重要的风险因素。糖尿病的延迟诊断会增加患者的发病率。在一个拥有大型临床数据仓库的城市学术医疗中心,我们使用了一种新颖的算法来识别56794名符合疾病筛查条件的糖尿病患者家庭成员。我们发现,30.6%的患者未按照当前指南的建议接受糖尿病筛查。此外,我们的分析表明,有不止一名家庭成员患病以及女性是接受糖尿病筛查的重要因素。这项研究表明,应用于电子健康记录数据的信息学方法可用于识别有疾病发展风险的患者,从而支持临床护理。

相似文献

1
Low Screening Rates for Diabetes Mellitus Among Family Members of Affected Relatives.糖尿病患者亲属中糖尿病的筛查率较低。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1471-1477. eCollection 2018.
2
Screening for diabetes in an outpatient clinic population.门诊人群中的糖尿病筛查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jan;17(1):23-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10420.x.
3
Adherence to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2002 osteoporosis screening guidelines in academic primary care settings.美国预防服务工作组 2002 年骨质疏松症筛查指南在学术性初级保健环境中的应用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jan;21(1):50-3. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2560. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
4
Glucose testing and insufficient follow-up of abnormal results: a cohort study.血糖检测及异常结果随访不足:一项队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 12;6:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-87.
5
Screening for diabetes in optometry practices: acceptability to users.眼科诊所中的糖尿病筛查:用户的可接受性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jul;31(4):367-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00826.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
Evaluation of medical and dental visits in New York City: Opportunities to identify persons with and at risk for diabetes mellitus in dental settings.纽约市医疗和牙科就诊评估:在牙科环境中识别糖尿病患者和糖尿病高危人群的机会。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;46(1):102-108. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12334. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Accessing clinical services and retention in care following screening for hypertension and diabetes among Malawian adults: an urban/rural comparison.马拉维成年人高血压和糖尿病筛查后的临床服务获取及护理留存情况:城乡比较
J Hypertens. 2016 Nov;34(11):2172-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001070.
8
Quality of diabetes and hyperlipidemia screening before a first myocardial infarction.首次心肌梗死前的糖尿病和高脂血症筛查质量。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Nov;29(11):1382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
9
Psoriasis and cardiovascular screening rates in the United States.美国的银屑病与心血管疾病筛查率
J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Jan;12(1):e14-9.
10
Screening for diabetes in general practice: cross sectional population study.基层医疗中糖尿病的筛查:横断面人群研究
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):548-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.548.

引用本文的文献

1
SynthA1c: Towards Clinically Interpretable Patient Representations for Diabetes Risk Stratification.合成糖化血红蛋白(SynthA1c):迈向用于糖尿病风险分层的可临床解释的患者表征
Predict Intell Med. 2023 Oct;14277:46-57. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46005-0_5.
2
Determinants of Adherence to Diabetes Screening in Iranian Adults With a Positive Family History of Diabetes.有糖尿病家族史的伊朗成年人糖尿病筛查依从性的决定因素。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2021 May;54(3):190-198. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.496. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease Heritability Inferred from Familial Relationships Reported in Medical Records.从医疗记录中报告的家族关系推断出的疾病遗传率。
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1692-1704.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.032. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Patterns and predictors of adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations in Alberta's Tomorrow Project participants stratified by risk.按风险分层的艾伯塔省明日计划参与者对结直肠癌筛查建议的依从模式和预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5095-4.
3
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.美国的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查——2010 年至 2015 年。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1278-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416.
4
An Assessment of Family History Information Captured in an Electronic Health Record.电子健康记录中所记录的家族病史信息评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:2035-42. eCollection 2015.
5
Deaths: Final Data for 2013.死亡情况:2013年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Feb 16;64(2):1-119.
6
Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals.评估两家医院癌症登记处和电子病历系统中的种族和族裔数据质量。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):627-34. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv156. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Screening for Abnormal Blood Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查异常血糖和 2 型糖尿病:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 1;163(11):861-8. doi: 10.7326/M15-2345. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Race/ethnicity identification: vital for disparities research, quality improvement, and much more than "meets the eye".种族/族裔识别:对差异研究、质量改进至关重要,且意义远不止于“显而易见”。
Med Care. 2015 Aug;53(8):663-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000409.
9
Standardized data collection practices and the racial/ethnic distribution of hospitalized patients.标准化数据收集方法与住院患者的种族/族裔分布
Med Care. 2015 Aug;53(8):666-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000392.
10
Missed policy opportunities to advance health equity by recording demographic data in electronic health records.因未在电子健康记录中记录人口统计学数据而错失促进健康公平的政策机遇。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S380-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302384. Epub 2015 Apr 23.