Edelman David, Edwards Lloyd J, Olsen Maren K, Dudley Tara K, Harris Amy C, Blackwell Dana K, Oddone Eugene Z
Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, and the Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jan;17(1):23-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10420.x.
Opportunistic disease screening is the routine, asymptomatic disease screening of patients at the time of a physician encounter for other reasons. While the prevalence of unrecognized diabetes in community populations is well known, the prevalence in clinical populations is unknown.
To describe the prevalence, predictors, and clinical severity of unrecognized diabetes among outpatients at a major medical center.
A cross-sectional observational study at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Outpatients without recognized diabetes (N=1,253).
We screened patients for diabetes by using an initial random Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement, and then obtaining follow-up fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for all subjects with HbA1c > or =6.0%. A case of unrecognized diabetes was defined as either HbA1c > or =7.0% or FPG > or =7 mmol/L (126 mg/dL). Height and weight were obtained for all subjects. We also obtained resting blood pressure, fasting lipids, and urine protein in subjects with HbA1c > or =6.0%.
The prevalence of unrecognized diabetes was 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4 to 5.7). Factors associated with unrecognized diabetes were the diagnosis of hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.5; P=.004), weight >120% of ideal (adjusted OR, 2.2; P=.02), and history of a parent or sibling with diabetes (adjusted OR, 1.7; P=.06). Having a primary care provider did not raise or lower the risk for unrecognized diabetes (P=.73). Based on the new diagnosis, most patients (61%) found to have diabetes required a change in treatment either of their blood sugar or comorbid hypertension or hyperlipidemia in order to achieve targets recommended in published treatment guidelines. Patients reporting a primary care provider were no less likely to require a change in treatment (P=.20).
If diabetes screening is an effective intervention, opportunistic screening for diabetes may be the preferred method for screening, because there is substantial potential for case-finding in a medical center outpatient setting. A majority of patients with diabetes diagnosed at opportunistic screening will require a change in treatment of blood sugar, blood pressure, or lipids to receive optimal care.
机会性疾病筛查是指在患者因其他原因就诊时对其进行的常规无症状疾病筛查。虽然社区人群中未被识别的糖尿病患病率已为人熟知,但临床人群中的患病率尚不清楚。
描述一家大型医疗中心门诊患者中未被识别的糖尿病的患病率、预测因素及临床严重程度。
在达勒姆退伍军人事务医疗中心进行的一项横断面观察性研究。
未被诊断出患有糖尿病的门诊患者(N = 1253)。
我们首先通过随机测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)对患者进行糖尿病筛查,然后对所有HbA1c≥6.0%的受试者进行后续空腹血糖(FPG)检测。未被识别的糖尿病病例定义为HbA1c≥7.0%或FPG≥7 mmol/L(126 mg/dL)。记录所有受试者的身高和体重。我们还对HbA1c≥6.0%的受试者测量静息血压、空腹血脂和尿蛋白。
未被识别的糖尿病患病率为4.5%(95%置信区间[CI],3.4%至5.7%)。与未被识别的糖尿病相关的因素包括高血压诊断(校正比值比[OR],2.5;P = 0.004)、体重超过理想体重的120%(校正OR,2.2;P = 0.02)以及父母或兄弟姐妹有糖尿病病史(校正OR,1.7;P = 0.06)。有初级保健提供者并不会增加或降低未被识别的糖尿病风险(P = 0.73)。基于新的诊断结果,大多数被发现患有糖尿病的患者(61%)需要改变血糖治疗方案,或改变合并的高血压或高脂血症治疗方案,以达到已发表治疗指南中推荐的目标。报告有初级保健提供者的患者同样有可能需要改变治疗方案(P = 0.20)。
如果糖尿病筛查是一种有效的干预措施,那么机会性糖尿病筛查可能是首选的筛查方法,因为在医疗中心门诊环境中有很大的病例发现潜力。在机会性筛查中被诊断出患有糖尿病的大多数患者需要改变血糖、血压或血脂的治疗方案,以获得最佳治疗。