• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索尼娅·斯利夫卡研究参与者使用疾病修饰疗法的情况及成本:自2000年和2009年以来真的有什么变化吗?

Use and cost of disease-modifying therapies by Sonya Slifka Study participants: has anything really changed since 2000 and 2009?

作者信息

Minden Sarah L, Kinkel R Philip, Machado Helene T, Levin Jonathan S, Rosenthal Meredith B, Iezzoni Lisa I

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA.

Multiple Sclerosis Program, University of California San Diego, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019 Feb 20;5(1):2055217318820888. doi: 10.1177/2055217318820888. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.1177/2055217318820888
PMID:30815276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6385335/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies benefit individuals with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their utility remains unclear for those without relapses.

OBJECTIVE

To determine disease-modifying therapy use and costs in 2009, compare use in 2009 and 2000, and examine compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

METHODS

We determined the extent and characteristics of disease-modifying therapy use by participants in the Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study (Slifka) in 2000 (=2156) and 2009 (=2361) and estimated out-of-pocket and total (payer) costs for 2009. Two multivariable logistic regressions predicted disease-modifying therapy use.

RESULTS

Disease-modifying therapy use increased from 55.3% in 2000 to 61.5% in 2009. In 2009, disease-modifying therapy use was reported by 76.5% of participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, 73.2% with progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis, 62.5% with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, and 41.8% with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Use was significantly associated with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, shorter duration of illness, one to two relapses per year, non-ambulatory symptoms, using a cane, younger age, higher family income, and having health insurance. Average annual costs in 2009 were US$939-3101 for patients and US$16,302-18,928 for payers.

CONCLUSION

Use rates were highest for individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but substantial for those with progressive courses although clinical trials have not demonstrated significant benefits for them.

摘要

背景

疾病修饰疗法对复发型多发性硬化症患者有益,但对无复发患者的效用仍不明确。

目的

确定2009年疾病修饰疗法的使用情况和成本,比较2009年和2000年的使用情况,并检查对循证指南的依从性。

方法

我们确定了2000年(=2156例)和2009年(=2361例)索尼娅·斯利夫卡纵向多发性硬化症研究(斯利夫卡研究)参与者使用疾病修饰疗法的程度和特征,并估计了2009年的自付费用和总(支付方)费用。两项多变量逻辑回归预测了疾病修饰疗法的使用情况。

结果

疾病修饰疗法的使用率从2000年的55.3%增至2009年的61.5%。2009年,复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中有76.5%报告使用了疾病修饰疗法,进展复发型多发性硬化症患者中有73.2%,继发进展型多发性硬化症患者中有62.5%,原发进展型多发性硬化症患者中有41.8%。使用情况与复发缓解型多发性硬化症、病程较短、每年复发一至两次、非行走性症状、使用手杖、年龄较小、家庭收入较高以及拥有医疗保险显著相关。2009年患者的年均费用为939 - 3101美元,支付方为16302 - 18928美元。

结论

复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的使用率最高,但进展型病程患者的使用率也较高,尽管临床试验尚未证明对他们有显著益处。

相似文献

1
Use and cost of disease-modifying therapies by Sonya Slifka Study participants: has anything really changed since 2000 and 2009?索尼娅·斯利夫卡研究参与者使用疾病修饰疗法的情况及成本:自2000年和2009年以来真的有什么变化吗?
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019 Feb 20;5(1):2055217318820888. doi: 10.1177/2055217318820888. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
2
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
3
Disease-modifying agents in the Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study.索尼娅·斯利夫卡多发性硬化纵向研究中的疾病修饰药物。
Mult Scler. 2008 Jun;14(5):640-55. doi: 10.1177/1352458507086463.
4
The apparently milder course of multiple sclerosis: changes in the diagnostic criteria, therapy and natural history.多发性硬化症的表现似乎较轻:诊断标准、治疗方法和自然病程的变化。
Brain. 2020 Sep 1;143(9):2637-2652. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa145.
5
Predictors of Health Utility in Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Future Economic Models of Disease-Modifying Therapies.复发缓解型和继发进展型多发性硬化症患者健康效用的预测因素:对疾病修正治疗未来经济模型的启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Feb;39(2):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00964-w. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Mitoxantrone in relapsing-remitting and rapidly progressive multiple sclerosis: Ten-year clinical outcomes post-treatment with mitoxantrone.米托蒽醌治疗复发缓解型和快速进展型多发性硬化症:米托蒽醌治疗后十年的临床结果
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Sep;44:102330. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102330. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Societal economic burden of multiple sclerosis and cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies.多发性硬化症的社会经济负担及疾病修正疗法的成本效益
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1015256. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1015256. eCollection 2022.
8
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.复发缓解型和原发进展型多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效用分析。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Dec;32(12):1145-1157. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0566-9.
9
Real-World Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Classes of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯复发性缓解型多发性硬化症不同疾病修饰疗法的真实世界比较成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413261.
10
Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies.继发进展型多发性硬化症的发病不受当前复发型多发性硬化症治疗方法的影响。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018 Jun 26;4(2):2055217318783347. doi: 10.1177/2055217318783347. eCollection 2018 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Multiple Sclerosis Surveillance Registry: A Novel Interactive Database Within the Veterans Health Administration.多发性硬化症监测登记处:退伍军人健康管理局内的一个新型交互式数据库。
Fed Pract. 2020 Apr;37(Suppl 1):S18-S23.
2
The Interactive Web-Based Program MSmonitor for Self-Management and Multidisciplinary Care in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Quasi-Experimental Study of Short-Term Effects on Patient Empowerment.基于网络的交互式程序MSmonitor用于多发性硬化症患者的自我管理和多学科护理:对患者赋权短期影响的准实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 9;22(3):e14297. doi: 10.2196/14297.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization Patterns of Oral Disease-Modifying Drugs in Commercially Insured Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.商业保险覆盖的多发性硬化症患者中口腔疾病修饰药物的使用模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):113-121. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.113.
2
Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践指南推荐摘要:多发性硬化症成人的疾病修正治疗:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会的报告。
Neurology. 2018 Apr 24;90(17):777-788. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005347.
3
Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis over age 60.60 岁以上多发性硬化症患者中断疾病修正治疗。
Mult Scler. 2019 Apr;25(5):699-708. doi: 10.1177/1352458518765656. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Disease-modifying therapies can be safely discontinued in an individual with stable relapsing-remitting MS - Commentary.对于病情稳定的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,疾病修正治疗可以安全停用——评论
Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1192-1193. doi: 10.1177/1352458517717809. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
5
Disease-modifying therapies can be safely discontinued in an individual with stable relapsing-remitting MS - NO.对于病情稳定的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,改变病情的疗法可以安全停用——否。
Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1190-1192. doi: 10.1177/1352458517702556. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
6
To stop or not to stop disease modifying therapies in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, that is the question.在继发进展型多发性硬化症中是否停止疾病修饰疗法,这就是问题所在。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2017 Sep;17(9):847-849. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1340831. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
7
Stopping Disease-Modifying Therapy in Nonrelapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Experience from a Clinical Practice.停止非复发性多发性硬化症的疾病修饰治疗:临床实践经验
Int J MS Care. 2017 Jan-Feb;19(1):11-14. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2015-032.
8
Herding: a new phenomenon affecting medical decision-making in multiple sclerosis care? Lessons learned from DIScUTIR MS.从众行为:一种影响多发性硬化症护理中医疗决策的新现象?从DIScUTIR MS中吸取的教训
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jan 31;11:175-180. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S124192. eCollection 2017.
9
Quantifying Differences in Health Care Consumption for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis Within Privately and Publicly Insured Health Care Programs.量化私人和公共医疗保险计划中多发性硬化症管理的医疗保健消费差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Dec;22(12):1385-1391. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.12.1385.
10
Price analysis of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies marketed in the United States.美国市场上多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的价格分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov;32(11):1783-1788. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1208644. Epub 2016 Aug 2.