Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, , 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Mar 13;51(3):167-174. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2517.
To describe social outcomes for young adults with cerebral palsy, and to explore associations of social outcomes with their classification levels within the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability and Communication Function Classification Systems, and with the presence of intellectual disability.
A cross-sectional study with a population-based inclusion approach at a neuropaediatric referral centre in Sweden.
Sixty-one young adults with cerebral palsy, age 20-22 years.
Physical examination and questionnaires on social outcomes including living arrangements, relationships, occupation, personal finances, extent of family support with personal care, and physical examination.
Twenty percent of the young adults with cerebral palsy had moved out of the parental home. Forty-three percent were dependent on family support for basic activities of daily living. Seventy-nine percent of those without intellectual disability were employed or studying. The Communication Function Classification Systems, and presence of intellectual disability, demonstrated associations with most social outcomes, followed in significance by Manual Ability Classification System.
In this study young adults with cerebral palsy to a high extent lived in the parental home, and more often without employment, compared with their peers. Many were dependent on parental support, financially, and with activities of daily living. Intellectual disability and communication function were important determinants of social participation. Interventions aimed at alleviating the impact of these particular disabilities should be prioritized.
描述脑性瘫痪青年的社会结局,并探讨其社会结局与粗大运动功能、手动能力和沟通功能分类系统中的分类水平以及智力障碍的关系。
在瑞典的一家神经儿科转诊中心进行的基于人群的横断面研究。
61 名年龄在 20-22 岁的脑性瘫痪青年。
体格检查和社会结局问卷,包括居住安排、人际关系、职业、个人财务、家庭对个人护理的支持程度以及体检。
20%的脑性瘫痪青年已搬出父母家。43%的人基本日常生活活动依赖家庭支持。无智力障碍的人中有 79%在工作或学习。沟通功能分类系统和智力障碍的存在与大多数社会结局相关,其次是手动能力分类系统。
在这项研究中,与同龄人相比,脑性瘫痪青年很大程度上仍居住在父母家中,而且更有可能没有就业。许多人在经济上和日常生活活动方面依赖父母的支持。智力障碍和沟通功能是社会参与的重要决定因素。应优先考虑干预措施,以减轻这些特定残疾的影响。