Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences.
Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(10):1899-1909. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000690. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
It has been suggested that the Stroop task gives rise to 2 conflicts: the information conflict (color vs. word meaning) and the task conflict (name the color vs. read the word). However, behavioral indications for task conflict (reaction time [RT] congruent condition longer than RT neutral condition) appear under very restricted conditions. We conducted Stroop experiments and measured RT and pupil dilation. The results show a clear dissociation between RT and pupil dilation. We found the regular RT pattern-large interference and small, nonsignificant facilitation. In contrast, pupil dilation showed information conflict-larger pupil dilation to incongruent than to congruent and neutral conditions-and task conflict-larger pupil dilation to the congruent than to the neutral condition. Moreover, pupil indications for task conflict appeared earlier than indications for the information conflict. These results suggest that pupil changes could indicate conflict even in the absence of behavioral indications for the conflict. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
有人认为,斯特鲁普任务会产生 2 种冲突:信息冲突(颜色与单词含义)和任务冲突(命名颜色与阅读单词)。然而,行为上的任务冲突迹象(反应时间[RT]一致条件长于 RT 中性条件)仅在非常有限的条件下出现。我们进行了斯特鲁普实验并测量了 RT 和瞳孔扩张。结果表明 RT 和瞳孔扩张之间存在明显的分离。我们发现了一个规则的 RT 模式——不一致条件下的干扰较大,而促进作用较小且不显著。相比之下,瞳孔扩张显示出信息冲突——不一致条件下的瞳孔扩张大于一致和中性条件,以及任务冲突——一致条件下的瞳孔扩张大于中性条件。此外,任务冲突的瞳孔迹象比信息冲突的迹象更早出现。这些结果表明,即使在没有冲突行为迹象的情况下,瞳孔变化也可以表明冲突的存在。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。