Hershman Ronen, Sapir Ayelet, Keha Eldad, Wagner Michael, Weiss Elisabeth M, Henik Avishai
Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
School of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):956-962. doi: 10.1177/17470218241228709. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
In the standard colour-word Stroop task, participants are presented with colour words and required to respond to their colour while ignoring their meaning. Two types of conflict might occur in such experiments: information conflict and task conflict. Information conflict reflects the processing of two contradicting pieces of information and is indicated by shorter reaction times (RTs) in congruent than in incongruent trials. Task conflict reflects the additional effort associated with performing two tasks, as opposed to one, and is indicated by shorter RTs in neutral trials than in congruent trials (termed reverse facilitation). While information conflict is commonly seen in Stroop and Stroop-like tasks, task conflict is rarely observed. In the present study, participants were presented with coloured segments that, by applying Gestalt principles, could be perceived as colour words. We found that incongruent trials were slower than congruent trials, suggesting that participants successfully perceived the colour words, which led to involuntary reading. In addition, reversed facilitation was found so that neutral trials (i.e., trials that only consist of one task) were faster than congruent trials (as well as incongruent trials; both consist of two tasks). The presence of both interference from the incongruent trials and reverse facilitation suggests that involuntary reading could also occur in scenarios requiring cognitive effort.
在标准的颜色-文字斯特鲁普任务中,向参与者呈现颜色词,并要求他们对颜色做出反应,同时忽略其含义。在这类实验中可能会出现两种冲突:信息冲突和任务冲突。信息冲突反映了对两条相互矛盾的信息的处理,其表现为在一致试验中的反应时比不一致试验中的反应时短。任务冲突反映了执行两项任务(相对于一项任务)所额外付出的努力,其表现为在中性试验中的反应时比一致试验中的反应时短(称为反向促进)。虽然信息冲突在斯特鲁普及类似斯特鲁普的任务中很常见,但任务冲突很少被观察到。在本研究中,向参与者呈现彩色片段,通过应用格式塔原则,这些片段可被感知为颜色词。我们发现不一致试验比一致试验慢,这表明参与者成功地感知到了颜色词,从而导致了不由自主的阅读。此外,还发现了反向促进,即中性试验(即仅由一项任务组成的试验)比一致试验(以及不一致试验;两者都由两项任务组成)更快。不一致试验的干扰和反向促进的同时存在表明,不由自主的阅读也可能发生在需要认知努力的情境中。