Department of Psychology.
Department of Medicine.
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Sep;11(6):647-655. doi: 10.1037/tra0000441. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Decades of research suggest that people are able to function effectively in the world and maintain mental health and well-being, at least in part, by relying on effective sociocultural anxiety buffer systems to shield against the awareness of death. However, according to anxiety buffer disruption theory, posttraumatic stress reflects anxiety buffer disruption, signaling that sociocultural belief systems have been rendered unable to buffer the individual against death awareness. As such, we would not expect to see the normal responses to death awareness meant to bolster and defend those belief systems in participants with posttraumatic stress.
To test these hypotheses, we screened for posttraumatic stress in U.S. participants ( = 4,150) and recruited individuals with low ( = 193) and high ( = 205) posttraumatic stress symptoms. Each group was randomly assigned to a worldview-threat or -support condition, followed by a standardized measure of death-thought accessibility (DTA) and worldview defense.
In the nonthreat (worldview-support) condition, individuals with high (vs. low) posttraumatic stress had elevated DTA. Further, among individuals with low posttraumatic stress, worldview threat (vs. -support) increased DTA, which in turn mediated an increase in worldview defense; however, among those with high posttraumatic stress, worldview threat did not increase DTA and its effect on worldview defense was substantially reduced.
These findings supported the present hypotheses derived from anxiety buffer disruption theory, are important for understanding the existential dimension of posttraumatic stress, and may have implications for mental health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
几十年来的研究表明,人们能够通过依赖有效的社会文化焦虑缓冲系统来有效地在世界上发挥作用,并保持心理健康和幸福感,至少在一定程度上可以防止意识到死亡。然而,根据焦虑缓冲破坏理论,创伤后应激反应反映了焦虑缓冲破坏,表明社会文化信仰体系已经无法缓冲个体对死亡意识的感知。因此,我们不应该期望在创伤后应激反应的参与者中看到旨在支持和捍卫这些信仰体系的对死亡意识的正常反应。
为了检验这些假设,我们对美国参与者(n=4150)进行了创伤后应激筛选,并招募了低(n=193)和高(n=205)创伤后应激症状的个体。每个组都被随机分配到世界观威胁或支持条件下,然后接受标准化的死亡思维可及性(DTA)和世界观防御测量。
在非威胁(世界观支持)条件下,高(vs.低)创伤后应激的个体的 DTA 更高。此外,在低创伤后应激的个体中,世界观威胁(vs.支持)增加了 DTA,这反过来又介导了世界观防御的增加;然而,在高创伤后应激的个体中,世界观威胁并没有增加 DTA,其对世界观防御的影响大大降低。
这些发现支持了焦虑缓冲破坏理论的假设,对于理解创伤后应激的存在维度很重要,并且可能对心理健康有影响。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。