• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Authenticity as a Resilience Factor Against CV-19 Threat Among Those With Chronic Pain and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.在慢性疼痛和创伤后应激障碍患者中,真实性作为抵御新冠-19威胁的复原力因素。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:643869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643869. eCollection 2021.
2
Pain-related disability, PTSD symptoms, and mood among a comorbid chronic pain and PTSD sample prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情之前及期间,共病慢性疼痛和创伤后应激障碍样本中的疼痛相关残疾、创伤后应激障碍症状及情绪状况。
J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(6):1515-1532. doi: 10.1177/13591053211051821. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
PTSD is not the emblematic disorder of the COVID-19 pandemic; adjustment disorder is.创伤后应激障碍并不是 COVID-19 大流行的标志性障碍;适应障碍才是。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03903-5.
4
Comparison of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Instruments From Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition vs Fifth Edition in a Large Cohort of US Military Service Members and Veterans.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版与第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表在美军和退伍军人大型队列中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218072. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8072.
5
The association of probable PTSD at baseline and pain-related outcomes after chronic pain rehabilitation: A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria for PTSD.在慢性疼痛康复后,基于 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍标准,可能患有 PTSD 与疼痛相关结局的相关性。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Mar;26(3):709-718. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1899. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
7
Posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain are associated with opioid use disorder: Results from a 2012-2013 American nationally representative survey.创伤后应激障碍和慢性疼痛与阿片类药物使用障碍有关:来自 2012-2013 年美国全国代表性调查的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Veterans With Comorbid Posttraumatic Headache and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤后头痛和创伤后应激障碍症状并存的退伍军人认知行为治疗:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):746-757. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1567.
9
Coping strategies and beliefs about pain in veterans with comorbid chronic pain and significant levels of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.慢性疼痛合并创伤后应激障碍症状明显的退伍军人的应对策略和疼痛信念。
Eur J Pain. 2012 Feb;16(2):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.010.
10
Posttraumatic stress disorder and physical comorbidity among female children and adolescents: results from service-use data.女童和青少年中的创伤后应激障碍与躯体共病:基于服务使用数据的结果
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e767-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0608.

引用本文的文献

1
Grand Challenges in Neuromodulatory Interventions.神经调节干预的重大挑战。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 2;2:700552. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.700552. eCollection 2021.
2
Whole Health Use and Interest Across Veterans With Co-Occurring Chronic Pain and PTSD: An Examination of the 18 VA Medical Center Flagship Sites.患有慢性疼痛和创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人对整体健康的使用情况和兴趣:对18个退伍军人事务部医疗中心旗舰站点的调查。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2022 Feb 11;11:21649561211065374. doi: 10.1177/21649561211065374. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Terror Management Theory and the COVID-19 Pandemic.恐惧管理理论与新冠疫情
J Humanist Psychol. 2021 Mar;61(2):173-189. doi: 10.1177/0022167820959488.
2
The suffering of chronic pain patients on a wait list: Are they amenable to narrative therapy?等待治疗的慢性疼痛患者的痛苦:他们适合叙事疗法吗?
Can J Pain. 2017 Jul 6;1(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1316173. eCollection 2017.
3
Existential positive psychology and integrative meaning therapy.存在主义积极心理学与整合意义疗法
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(7-8):565-578. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1814703. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Identity disruption and its association with mental health among veterans with reintegration difficulty.退役军人再融入困难与身份认同混乱及其与心理健康的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Nov;56(11):2152-2166. doi: 10.1037/dev0001106. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, June 24-30, 2020.《2020 年 6 月 24 日至 30 日美国在新冠疫情期间的心理健康、物质使用和自杀意念状况》
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 14;69(32):1049-1057. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1.
6
A test of the fear avoidance model to predict chronic pain outcomes in a polytrauma sample.恐惧回避模型在多发伤样本中预测慢性疼痛结局的检验。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(1):35-43. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203084.
7
Drinking to cope with the pandemic: The unique associations of COVID-19-related perceived threat and psychological distress to drinking behaviors in American men and women.应对疫情而饮酒:新冠相关感知威胁和心理困扰与美国男女饮酒行为的独特关联。
Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106532. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106532. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
8
Factors associated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptomatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical implications for U.S. young adult mental health.与 COVID-19 大流行期间抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状相关的因素:对美国青年心理健康的临床意义。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113172. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113172. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
Coping with COVID-19: Exposure to COVID-19 and Negative Impact on Livelihood Predict Elevated Mental Health Problems in Chinese Adults.应对 COVID-19:接触 COVID-19 和生计受负面影响可预测中国成年人心理健康问题加重。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 29;17(11):3857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113857.
10
Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic.心理健康与新冠疫情
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2008017. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

在慢性疼痛和创伤后应激障碍患者中,真实性作为抵御新冠-19威胁的复原力因素。

Authenticity as a Resilience Factor Against CV-19 Threat Among Those With Chronic Pain and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

作者信息

Reed David E, Lehinger Elizabeth, Cobos Briana, Vail Kenneth E, Nabity Paul S, Helm Peter J, Galgali Madhwa S, McGeary Donald D

机构信息

Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:643869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643869. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643869
PMID:33995199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8113775/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The novel coronavirus (2019; CV-19) is linked to increases in emotional distress and may be particularly problematic for those with pre-existing mental and physical conditions, such as chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, little empirical research has been published on resilience factors in these individuals. The present study aims to examine authenticity as a resilience factor among those with chronic pain and/or PTSD.

METHODS

Prior to the national response to the pandemic (January 10-24, 2020), participants were screened for pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index; ODI) and PTSD symptoms (Posttraumatic Checklist for DSM-5; PCL-5), and on the basis of those responses were categorized into one of four groups: healthy, chronic pain only, PTSD only, or comorbid chronic pain and PTSD. During the CV-19 pandemic (May 5-May 13, 2020), participants responded again to the ODI and PCL-5, in addition to the Wood Authenticity Scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and items related to the CV-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 110 participants (54.55% women), aged 42.19 ( = 13.16), completed the survey during the pandemic. The comorbid group endorsed higher levels of CV-19 Threat and Impact compared to all other groups. Authenticity moderated this relationship relevant to CV-19 Threat among those in the chronic pain only group, and not in any other group.

CONCLUSION

The comorbid group endorsed higher levels of CV-19 Threat and Impact compared to all other groups. Importantly, greater authenticity was associated with less CV-19 Threat in the chronic pain only group, and not in any other group. The present study also highlights the importance of engaging authentically for those with chronic pain during the pandemic.

摘要

目的

新型冠状病毒(2019;CV - 19)与情绪困扰的增加有关,对于那些已有精神和身体疾病的人,如慢性疼痛和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者,可能尤其成问题。然而,关于这些个体复原力因素的实证研究很少发表。本研究旨在检验真实性作为慢性疼痛和/或PTSD患者复原力因素的情况。

方法

在国家对疫情做出反应之前(2020年1月10日至24日),对参与者进行疼痛相关残疾筛查(奥斯维斯特里残疾指数;ODI)和PTSD症状筛查(DSM - 5创伤后检查表;PCL - 5),并根据这些反应将他们分为四组之一:健康组、仅患有慢性疼痛组、仅患有PTSD组或慢性疼痛与PTSD共病组。在CV - 19大流行期间(2020年5月5日至13日),参与者除了再次对ODI和PCL - 5做出反应外,还对伍德真实性量表、简明疼痛量表以及与CV - 19大流行相关的项目做出反应。

结果

共有110名参与者(54.55%为女性),年龄42.19(= 13.16),在大流行期间完成了调查。与所有其他组相比,共病组认可的CV - 19威胁和影响水平更高。真实性调节了仅患有慢性疼痛组中与CV - 19威胁相关的这种关系,而在其他任何组中均未调节。

结论

与所有其他组相比,共病组认可的CV - 19威胁和影响水平更高。重要的是,在仅患有慢性疼痛组中,更高的真实性与更低的CV - 19威胁相关,而在其他任何组中均无此关联。本研究还强调了在大流行期间真实投入对慢性疼痛患者的重要性。