Suppr超能文献

成比例干预试验中的统计设计与分析:一项系统综述

Statistical design and analysis in trials of proportionate interventions: a systematic review.

作者信息

Candlish Jane, Teare M Dawn, Cohen Judith, Bywater Tracey

机构信息

ScHARR, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Hull Health Trials Unit, University of Hull/Hull York Medical School, York, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Feb 28;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In proportionate or adaptive interventions, the dose or intensity can be adjusted based on individual need at predefined decision stages during the delivery of the intervention. The development of such interventions may require an evaluation of the effectiveness of the individual stages in addition to the whole intervention. However, evaluating individual stages of an intervention has various challenges, particularly the statistical design and analysis. This review aimed to identify the use of trials of proportionate interventions and how they are being designed and analysed in current practice.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO for articles published between 2010 and 2015 inclusive. We considered trials of proportionate interventions in all fields of research. For each trial, its aims, design and analysis were extracted. The data synthesis was conducted using summary statistics and a narrative format.

RESULTS

Our review identified 44 proportionate intervention trials, comprising 28 trial results, 13 protocols and three secondary analyses. These were mostly described as stepped care (n=37) and mainly focussed on mental health research (n=30). The other studies were aimed at finding an optimal adaptive treatment strategy (n=7) in a variety of therapeutic areas. Further terminology used included adaptive intervention, staged intervention, sequentially multiple assignment trial or a two-phase design. The median number of decision stages in the interventions was two and only one study explicitly evaluated the effect of the individual stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials of proportionate staged interventions are being used predominantly within the mental health field. However, few studies consider the different stages of the interventions, either at the design or the analysis phase, and how they may interact with one another. There is a need for further guidance on the design, analyses and reporting across trials of proportionate interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero, CRD42016033781. Registered on 2 February 2016.

摘要

背景

在相称性或适应性干预中,剂量或强度可在干预实施过程中的预定义决策阶段根据个体需求进行调整。此类干预措施的开发可能除了需要评估整个干预措施的有效性之外,还需评估各个阶段的有效性。然而,评估干预措施的各个阶段面临各种挑战,尤其是统计设计和分析方面。本综述旨在确定相称性干预试验的应用情况以及当前实践中它们是如何进行设计和分析的。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、科学网和PsycINFO数据库,以查找2010年至2015年(含)期间发表的文章。我们纳入了所有研究领域的相称性干预试验。对于每项试验,提取了其目的、设计和分析方法。采用汇总统计和叙述性格式进行数据综合分析。

结果

我们的综述共识别出44项相称性干预试验,包括28项试验结果、13项方案和3项二次分析。这些试验大多被描述为逐步照护(n = 37),主要集中在心理健康研究领域(n = 30)。其他研究旨在在各种治疗领域中寻找最佳适应性治疗策略(n = 7)。使用的其他术语包括适应性干预、分阶段干预、序贯多重分配试验或两阶段设计。干预措施中的决策阶段中位数为两个,只有一项研究明确评估了各个阶段的效果。

结论

相称性分阶段干预试验主要应用于心理健康领域。然而,很少有研究在设计或分析阶段考虑干预措施的不同阶段以及它们之间可能的相互作用。需要针对相称性干预试验的设计、分析和报告提供进一步的指导。

试验注册

Prospero,CRD42016033781。于2016年2月2日注册。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验