Schröder-Bäck Peter, Martakis Kyriakos
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of International Health, Maastricht University, Postbus 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, Niederlande.
Sozialpädiatrisches Zentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Apr;62(4):472-478. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02915-z.
Vaccination recommendations of public health institutes and personal decisions to get vaccinated cannot be grounded on scientific evidence alone. If and under what conditions vaccinations should take place can only be decided for concrete contexts and accompanied by justification processes applying ethical norms and values.This paper offers a normative framework for vaccination ethics. It reflects the principles and argumentation of individual and social ethics and discusses public health ethical tools available in the literature. The specific challenges of autonomous and health literate behavior from a justice perspective are examined. Also discussed is the position of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO).
公共卫生机构的疫苗接种建议以及个人的接种决定不能仅基于科学证据。是否以及在何种条件下进行疫苗接种只能针对具体情况做出决定,并伴随着适用伦理规范和价值观的论证过程。本文提供了一个疫苗接种伦理的规范框架。它反映了个人伦理和社会伦理的原则及论证,并讨论了文献中可用的公共卫生伦理工具。从正义的角度审视了自主和具备健康素养行为的具体挑战。还讨论了德国疫苗接种常设委员会(STIKO)的立场。