Lee Su Yeon, Park Sung-Ji, Kim Eun Kyoung, Chang Sung-A, Lee Sang-Chol, Ahn Joong Hyun, Carriere Keumhee, Park Seung Woo
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;35(7):1241-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01565-1. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function remains controversial. We evaluated the predictive value of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in asymptomatic severe AR with preserved LV systolic function for identifying high risk patients who might benefit from early referral for surgery. Symptom-limited treadmill ESE was performed in 67 asymptomatic patients with severe AR (effective regurgitant orifice area > 30 mm, regurgitant volume > 60 ml) and preserved LV systolic function without LV dilatation [ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% and LV end-systolic diameter ≤ 50 mm]. A post-exercise EF increase of > 4% was defined as presence of contractile reserve (CR). The primary outcome was defined as the composite of symptoms development, deterioration in LV function (EF < 50% in echocardiography) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) at follow-up. Operations performed within 60 days of ESE were excluded. Twenty-eight patients were CR (+) and 39 patients were CR (-). Compared with the CR (+) group, the CR (-) group was older (52.0 ± 14.0 years vs. 43.8 ± 10.6 years, p = 0.011) and had higher Ln N-terminal natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) [5.2 (4.5-5.7) vs. 4.1 (3.7-5.1), p = 0.001]. The CR (-) group showed lower exercise time than the CR (+) group (576 ± 159 s vs. 671 ± 108 s, p = 0.008). Otherwise, there were no differences in demographics and imaging data between the two groups. During a follow-up duration of 46 ± 23 months, the primary outcome occurred in 17 patients (25%) including development of symptoms (n = 9), new-onset LV systolic dysfunction (n = 1) and AVR (n = 7). Fourteen of 17 were CR (-) group patients. The survival rate during follow-up was significantly lower in the CR (-) group than in the CR (+) group of asymptomatic severe AR patients (log-rank p = 0.035). The absence of CR in ESE is independently associated with deterioration of symptoms or LV systolic function in asymptomatic patients with severe AR and preserved LV systolic function. It can further risk stratify asymptomatic patients with severe AR and preserved LV systolic function and may influence the optimal timing of AVR.
对于无症状的严重主动脉瓣反流(AR)且左心室(LV)收缩功能保留的患者,其管理仍存在争议。我们评估了运动负荷超声心动图(ESE)在无症状严重AR且LV收缩功能保留的患者中识别可能从早期转诊手术中获益的高危患者的预测价值。对67例无症状严重AR(有效反流口面积>30mm,反流容积>60ml)且LV收缩功能保留且无LV扩张[射血分数(EF)≥50%且LV收缩末期直径≤50mm]的患者进行了症状限制的平板运动ESE。运动后EF增加>4%被定义为存在收缩储备(CR)。主要结局定义为随访期间症状出现、LV功能恶化(超声心动图中EF<50%)和主动脉瓣置换(AVR)的综合情况。排除在ESE后60天内进行的手术。28例患者为CR(+),39例患者为CR(-)。与CR(+)组相比,CR(-)组年龄更大(52.0±14.0岁 vs. 43.8±10.6岁,p=0.011)且N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平更高[5.2(4.5 - 5.7) vs. 4.1(3.7 - 5.1),p=0.001]。CR(-)组的运动时间低于CR(+)组(576±159秒 vs. 671±108秒,p=0.008)。此外,两组在人口统计学和影像学数据方面无差异。在46±23个月的随访期间,17例患者(25%)出现了主要结局,包括症状出现(n=9)、新发LV收缩功能障碍(n=1)和AVR(n=7)。17例患者中有14例是CR(-)组患者。无症状严重AR患者中,CR(-)组的随访期间生存率显著低于CR(+)组(对数秩检验p=0.035)。ESE中无CR与无症状严重AR且LV收缩功能保留的患者的症状恶化或LV收缩功能障碍独立相关。它可以进一步对无症状严重AR且LV收缩功能保留的患者进行风险分层,并可能影响AVR的最佳时机。