Akinbami Lara J, Salo Paivi M, Cloutier Michelle M, Wilkerson Jesse C, Elward Kurtis S, Mazurek Jacek M, Williams Sonja, Zeldin Darryl C
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
United States Public Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA.
J Asthma. 2020 May;57(5):543-555. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1579831. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Although primary care clinicians provide >60% of U.S. asthma care, no nationally representative study has examined variation in adherence among primary care groups to four cornerstone domains of the Expert Panel Report-3 asthma guidelines: assessment/monitoring, patient education, environmental assessment, and medications. We used the 2012 National Asthma Survey of Physicians: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to compare adherence by family/general medicine practitioners (FM/GM), internists, pediatricians and Community Health Center mid-level clinicians (CHC). Adherence was self-reported ( = 1355 clinicians). Adjusted odds of almost always adhering to each recommendation (≥75% of the time) were estimated controlling for clinician/practice characteristics, and agreement and self-efficacy with guideline recommendations. A higher percentage of pediatricians adhered to most assessment/monitoring recommendations compared to FM/GM and other groups (e.g. 71.6% [SE 4.0] almost always assessed daytime symptoms versus 50.6% [SE 5.1]-51.1% [SE 5.8], -test < 0.05) but low percentages from all groups almost always performed spirometry (6.8% [SE 2.0]-16.8% [SE 4.7]). Pediatricians were more likely to provide asthma action/treatment plans than FM/GM and internists. Internists were more likely to assess school/work triggers than pediatricians and CHC (environmental assessment). All groups prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for daily control (84.0% [SE 3.7]-90.7% [SE 2.5]) (medications). In adjusted analyses, pediatric specialty, high self-efficacy and frequent specialist referral were associated with high adherence. Pediatricians were more likely to report high adherence than other clinicians. Self- efficacy and frequent referral were also associated with adherence. Adherence was higher for history-taking recommendations and lower for recommendations involving patient education, equipment and expertise.
尽管基层医疗临床医生提供了超过60%的美国哮喘护理,但尚无全国代表性研究考察基层医疗群体对《专家委员会报告-3》哮喘指南四个基石领域(评估/监测、患者教育、环境评估和药物治疗)的依从性差异。我们利用2012年全国医生哮喘调查:全国门诊医疗护理调查,比较家庭/普通科医生(FM/GM)、内科医生、儿科医生和社区卫生中心中级临床医生(CHC)的依从性。依从性通过自我报告获得(n = 1355名临床医生)。在控制临床医生/执业特征以及对指南建议的认同和自我效能的情况下,估计几乎总是遵循每项建议(≥75%的时间)的调整后比值比。与FM/GM及其他群体相比,更高比例的儿科医生遵循了大多数评估/监测建议(例如,71.6%[标准误4.0]几乎总是评估日间症状,而FM/GM为50.6%[标准误5.1] - 51.1%[标准误5.8],P检验<0.05),但所有群体中几乎总是进行肺功能测定的比例较低(6.8%[标准误2.0] - 16.8%[标准误4.7])。儿科医生比FM/GM和内科医生更有可能提供哮喘行动计划/治疗方案。内科医生比儿科医生和CHC更有可能评估学校/工作触发因素(环境评估)。所有群体均为日常控制开具吸入性糖皮质激素(84.0%[标准误3.7] - 90.7%[标准误2.5])(药物治疗)。在调整分析中,儿科专科、高自我效能和频繁转诊至专科与高依从性相关。儿科医生比其他临床医生更有可能报告高依从性。自我效能和频繁转诊也与依从性相关。病史采集建议的依从性较高,而涉及患者教育、设备和专业知识的建议的依从性较低。