• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用回顾性电子健康记录处方数据确定儿童哮喘严重程度:2020年国家哮喘教育与预防计划指南更新前后的分析

Determination of pediatric asthma severity using retrospective electronic health record prescription data: an analysis before and after the 2020 national asthma education and prevention program guideline update.

作者信息

Pan Jinqian, Xu Jie, Fedele David, Wu Yonghui, Brailsford Jennifer, Fishe Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2025 Jun 10:1-11. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2025.2514265.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2025.2514265
PMID:40459987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12287910/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Development of a feasible, accurate method to assess pediatric asthma severity would benefit clinical care and research. This study sought to determine pediatric asthma severity from retrospective electronic health record prescription data, and to compare severities before and after the 2020 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guideline update.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients ages 2 - 18 years of age from a large, multi-center healthcare provider. We assessed severity by mapping asthma-related medication prescriptions with NAEPP step-up therapy guidelines. We compared severities between the 2007 NAEPP guideline (2011-2020) and 2020 NAEPP guideline (2021-2023) periods.

RESULTS

We identified 55,818 pediatric asthma patients with a median age of 7.5 years. Overall, were either mild intermittent (41.6%) or mild persistent severity (34.9%), followed by 9.7% moderate persistent and 4.8% severe persistent severity. From the 2007 to 2020 NAEPP period, there was ∼5% decrease in mild persistent and moderate persistent severity, and a large increase in undefined severity from 7.0% to 19.6% after the 2020 NAEPP update.

CONCLUSIONS

This study's approach using outpatient medication prescription data to determine pediatric asthma severity according to NAEPP guidelines classified over 90% of patients. After the 2020 NAEPP guideline update, we found decreases in the proportion of children having mild and moderate persistent severity, and a large increase in patients for whom severity could not be determined due to off-label prescriptions. Mapping pediatric asthma severity through medication prescriptions is feasible, but further work is required to understand off-label prescribing patterns in pediatric asthma.

摘要

目的

开发一种可行、准确的评估儿童哮喘严重程度的方法将有助于临床护理和研究。本研究旨在通过回顾性电子健康记录处方数据确定儿童哮喘严重程度,并比较2020年国家哮喘教育与预防计划(NAEPP)指南更新前后的严重程度。

方法

这项回顾性分析纳入了来自一家大型多中心医疗服务机构的2至18岁患者。我们根据NAEPP逐步升级治疗指南对哮喘相关药物处方进行映射来评估严重程度。我们比较了2007年NAEPP指南(2011 - 2020年)和2020年NAEPP指南(2021 - 2023年)期间的严重程度。

结果

我们确定了55818名儿童哮喘患者,中位年龄为7.5岁。总体而言,轻度间歇性(41.6%)或轻度持续性严重程度(34.9%)居多,其次是中度持续性(9.7%)和重度持续性严重程度(4.8%)。从2007年到2020年NAEPP期间,轻度持续性和中度持续性严重程度下降了约5%,2020年NAEPP更新后,未明确严重程度大幅增加,从7.0%增至19.6%。

结论

本研究使用门诊药物处方数据根据NAEPP指南确定儿童哮喘严重程度的方法对超过90%的患者进行了分类。2020年NAEPP指南更新后,我们发现轻度和中度持续性严重程度的儿童比例下降,因超说明书用药处方导致严重程度无法确定的患者大幅增加。通过药物处方映射儿童哮喘严重程度是可行的,但需要进一步开展工作来了解儿童哮喘超说明书用药模式。

相似文献

1
Determination of pediatric asthma severity using retrospective electronic health record prescription data: an analysis before and after the 2020 national asthma education and prevention program guideline update.利用回顾性电子健康记录处方数据确定儿童哮喘严重程度:2020年国家哮喘教育与预防计划指南更新前后的分析
J Asthma. 2025 Jun 10:1-11. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2025.2514265.
2
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.
3
Increased versus stable doses of inhaled corticosteroids for exacerbations of chronic asthma in adults and children.成人和儿童慢性哮喘加重时,增加与稳定剂量的吸入皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD007524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007524.pub5.
4
Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma.数字干预措施以提高哮喘维持药物治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):CD013030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013030.pub2.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.改善哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD012226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012226.pub2.
7
Intermittent inhaled corticosteroid therapy versus placebo for persistent asthma in children and adults.间歇性吸入皮质类固醇疗法与安慰剂治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 22;2015(7):CD011032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011032.pub2.
8
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination inhaler maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与联合吸入器维持治疗的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 16;2013(12):CD009019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009019.pub2.
9
Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in children with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.福莫特罗或沙美特罗常规用药对哮喘儿童的安全性:Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD010005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010005.pub2.
10
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与当前最佳实践(包括吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗)的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD007313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007313.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining Federated Machine Learning and Qualitative Methods to Investigate Novel Pediatric Asthma Subtypes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.联合联邦机器学习和定性方法研究新型儿科哮喘亚型:混合方法研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 8;13:e57981. doi: 10.2196/57981.
2
Racial and Ethnic Minorities at the Highest Risk of Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A United States Electronic Health Record Analysis.未得到控制的中重度哮喘风险最高的种族和少数族裔:一项美国电子健康记录分析。
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 May 12;16:567-577. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S383817. eCollection 2023.
3
Association between bronchopulmonary dysplasia and early respiratory morbidity in children with respiratory distress syndrome: a case-control study using nationwide data.支气管肺发育不良与呼吸窘迫综合征患儿早期呼吸系统发病率的关系:基于全国数据的病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11657-z.
4
Health-Related Quality of Life and Health Utilities of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Asthma: Evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.轻度、中度和重度哮喘的健康相关生活质量与健康效用:来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jul 28;14:929-941. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S316278. eCollection 2021.
5
Developing and evaluating a pediatric asthma severity computable phenotype derived from electronic health records.开发和评估基于电子健康记录的儿童哮喘严重程度可计算表型。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2162-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.045. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
Managing Asthma in Adolescents and Adults: 2020 Asthma Guideline Update From the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program.青少年和成人哮喘管理:国家哮喘教育和预防计划 2020 年哮喘指南更新。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2301-2317. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21974.
7
National Asthma Education and Prevention Program 2020 Guideline Update: Where Do We Go from Here?《国家哮喘教育与预防计划2020年指南更新:我们将何去何从?》
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 15;203(2):164-167. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4236ED.
8
Medical Costs and Productivity Loss Due to Mild, Moderate, and Severe Asthma in the United States.美国轻度、中度和重度哮喘导致的医疗成本及生产力损失
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Oct 29;13:545-555. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S272681. eCollection 2020.
9
The validity of diagnostic algorithms to identify asthma patients in healthcare administrative databases: a systematic literature review.医疗管理数据库中用于识别哮喘患者的诊断算法的有效性:一项系统文献综述。
J Asthma. 2022 Jan;59(1):152-168. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1827425. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Use of National Asthma Guidelines by Allergists and Pulmonologists: A National Survey.过敏症专科医生和肺科医生对国家哮喘指南的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):3011-3020.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Apr 25.