Bryant-Stephens Tyra, Kenyon Chen C, Tingey Colleen, Apter Andrea, Pappas Julie, Minto Natalie, Stewart Yvonne S, Shults Justine
Division of General Pediatrics, Community Asthma Prevention Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
PolicyLab and Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Dec 1;178(12):1260-1269. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3967.
Childhood asthma is characterized by pervasive disparities, including 3-fold higher hospitalization rates and 7-fold higher death rates for Black children compared with White children. To address asthma disparities, one must intervene in all lived environments.
To determine if a community health worker (CHW) intervention to connect the primary care, home, and school for low-income minoritized school-aged children with asthma and their caregivers improves asthma control.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a hybrid effectiveness/implementation trial using a 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized clinical trial design of 36 schools crossed with participant-level randomization into a clinic-based CHW intervention. The study was conducted from May 2018 to June 2022. The intervention took place in primary care offices, homes, and 36 West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, public and charter schools. Children aged 5 to 13 years with uncontrolled asthma were recruited from local primary care practices.
Asthma management, trigger remediation, and care coordination occurred in school, home, and primary care settings. Children were followed up for 12 months. The Yes We Can Children's Asthma Program, Open Airways For Schools Plus, and school-based asthma therapy were implemented.
Improvement in asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire, comparing the mean difference between groups 1 year after randomization with their baseline (difference in differences). Both primary care and school interventions were dramatically disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic; therefore, stratified analyses were performed to assess per-protocol intervention efficacy before the pandemic disruptions.
A total of 1875 participants were approached, 1248 were excluded, and 1 was withdrawn. The 626 analyzed study participants (mean [SD] age, 8.7 [2.4] years; 363 male [58%]) self-identified as Black race (96%) and non-Hispanic ethnicity (98%). Although all groups had statistically significant improvements in asthma control from baseline to 12 months (P- group: -0.46; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.33; P+ group: -0.57; 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.44; S- group: -0.47; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.35; S+ group: -0.59; 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.44), none of the difference-in-differences estimates from the primary prespecified models showed a clinically meaningful improvement in asthma control. Analysis from the prepandemic interval, however, demonstrated that children in the combined clinic-school intervention had a statistically significant improvement in asthma control scores compared with control (-0.79; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.18).
This randomized clinical trial provides preliminary evidence that connecting all lived environments for care of children can be accomplished through linkages with CHWs.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03514485.
儿童哮喘存在普遍差异,与白人儿童相比,黑人儿童的住院率高出3倍,死亡率高出7倍。为解决哮喘差异问题,必须对所有生活环境进行干预。
确定社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施能否改善哮喘控制,该干预措施旨在将低收入少数族裔学龄哮喘儿童及其照顾者的初级保健、家庭和学校联系起来。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究是一项混合有效性/实施试验,采用2×2析因、整群随机临床试验设计,涉及36所学校,并在参与者层面随机分为基于诊所的社区卫生工作者干预组。研究于2018年5月至2022年6月进行。干预在初级保健办公室、家庭以及宾夕法尼亚州费城西部的36所公立和特许学校进行。从当地初级保健机构招募5至13岁哮喘控制不佳的儿童。
在学校、家庭和初级保健场所进行哮喘管理、触发因素整治和护理协调。对儿童进行12个月的随访。实施了“我们能行儿童哮喘项目”、“学校加强开放气道”和基于学校的哮喘治疗。
通过哮喘控制问卷衡量哮喘控制的改善情况,比较随机分组1年后各组与基线之间的平均差异(差异的差异)。初级保健和学校干预均因新冠疫情而受到严重干扰;因此,进行分层分析以评估疫情干扰前按方案干预的疗效。
共接触1875名参与者,排除1248名,1名退出。626名纳入分析的研究参与者(平均[标准差]年龄为8.7[2.4]岁;363名男性[58%])自我认定为黑人(96%)和非西班牙裔(98%)。尽管所有组从基线到12个月哮喘控制均有统计学显著改善(P-组:-0.46;95%置信区间,-0.58至-0.33;P+组:-0.57;95%置信区间,-0.74至-0.44;S-组:-