Suppr超能文献

在美国一个城市的女性性工作者和注射毒品的女性中探索新的和现有的暴露前预防模式。

Exploring new and existing PrEP modalities among female sex workers and women who inject drugs in a U.S. city.

作者信息

Footer Katherine H A, Lim Sahnah, Rael Christine Tagliaferri, Greene George J, Carballa-Diéguez Alex, Giguere Rebecca, Martinez Michelle, Bockting Walter, D'Aquila Richard, Sherman Susan G

机构信息

a Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.

b Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2019 Oct;31(10):1207-1213. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1587352. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

To address a shortage in research on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) amongst women at high risk of HIV acquisition, this study explored the attitudes and preferences of female sex workers (FSW) ( = 15) and women who inject drugs (WWID) ( = 16) to existing (e.g., pill) and new (e.g., injection, implant) PrEP modalities, in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. This study reports on seven focus groups conducted between December 2016 and April 2017 and aims to provide new insights into FSW and WWID attitudes and preferences towards three different PrEP delivery methods (i.e., PrEP pill, PrEP implant, PrEP injection). Results draw upon the PrEP care continuum framework and distill existing factors, including lack of control over side effects with new, longer lasting modalities, better privacy with injections, increased adherence with reduced dosing schedules from longer lasting PrEP and new factors such as perceptibility concerns with respect to the PrEP implant relevant to PrEP uptake and adherence among two important overlapping, at-risk populations. The study contributes to a better understanding of barriers and facilitators to uptake and adherence for FSW and WWID around both existing and new PrEP modalities, with implications for future clinical trials and PrEP interventions with at risk-populations.

摘要

为解决针对高感染艾滋病毒风险女性的暴露前预防(PrEP)研究不足的问题,本研究在美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市,探讨了女性性工作者(FSW,n = 15)和注射毒品女性(WWID,n = 16)对现有(如口服药)和新型(如注射剂、植入剂)PrEP方式的态度和偏好。本研究报告了2016年12月至2017年4月期间开展的7个焦点小组的情况,旨在为FSW和WWID对三种不同PrEP给药方法(即PrEP口服药、PrEP植入剂、PrEP注射剂)的态度和偏好提供新见解。研究结果借鉴了PrEP照护连续统一体框架,并提炼出了现有因素,包括新型、长效方式对副作用缺乏控制、注射剂隐私性更好、长效PrEP减少给药次数从而提高依从性,以及诸如与PrEP植入剂相关的可感知性问题等新因素,这些因素与两个重要的重叠高危人群的PrEP采用率和依从性相关。该研究有助于更好地理解FSW和WWID在现有和新型PrEP方式方面采用和坚持PrEP的障碍及促进因素,对未来针对高危人群的临床试验和PrEP干预具有启示意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验