imec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, P.O. Box 9011, 6500 GM Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Biomech. 2019 Apr 18;87:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
Data reduction techniques are commonly applied to dynamic plantar pressure measurements, often prior to the measurement's analysis. In performing these data reductions, information is discarded from the measurement before it can be evaluated, leading to unkonwn consequences. In this study, we aim to provide the first assessment of what impact data reduction techniques have on plantar pressure measurements. Specifically, we quantify the extent to which information of any kind is discarded when performing common data reductions. Plantar pressure measurements were collected from 33 healthy controls, 8 Hallux Valgus patients, and 10 Metatarsalgia patients. Eleven common data reductions were then applied to the measurements, and the resulting datasets were compared to the original measurement in three ways. First, information theory was used to estimate the information content present in the original and reduced datasets. Second, principal component analysis was used to estimate the number of intrinsic dimensions present. Finally, a permutational multivariate ANOVA was performed to evaluate the significance of group differences between the healthy controls, Hallux Valgus, and Metatarsalgia groups. The evaluated data reductions showed a minimum of 99.1% loss in information content and losses of dimensionality between 20.8% and 83.3%. Significant group differences were also lost after each of the 11 data reductions (α=0.05), but these results may differ for other patient groups (especially those with highly-deformed footprints) or other region of interest definitions. Nevertheless, the existence of these results suggest that the diagnostic content of dynamic plantar pressure measurements is yet to be fully exploited.
数据缩减技术常用于动态足底压力测量,通常在测量分析之前进行。在执行这些数据缩减时,测量值在进行评估之前会丢弃一些信息,导致未知的后果。在这项研究中,我们旨在首次评估数据缩减技术对足底压力测量的影响。具体来说,我们量化了当执行常见数据缩减时丢弃任何类型信息的程度。从 33 名健康对照者、8 名拇外翻患者和 10 名跖痛症患者中收集了足底压力测量值。然后,将 11 种常见的数据缩减方法应用于这些测量值,并以三种方式将得到的数据集与原始测量值进行比较。首先,信息论被用来估计原始和缩减数据集的信息量。其次,主成分分析被用来估计存在的固有维度数量。最后,进行了置换多元方差分析,以评估健康对照组、拇外翻组和跖痛症组之间的组间差异的显著性。评估的数据缩减显示信息量至少损失了 99.1%,维度损失在 20.8%到 83.3%之间。在 11 次数据缩减中的每一次之后,都失去了显著的组间差异(α=0.05),但这些结果可能因其他患者群体(尤其是那些足部印迹高度变形的患者)或其他感兴趣区域的定义而有所不同。然而,这些结果的存在表明,动态足底压力测量的诊断内容尚未得到充分利用。