• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用核对清单评估医学研究的统计学内容。

Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.

作者信息

Gardner M J, Machin D, Campbell M J

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 22;292(6523):810-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810
PMID:3082452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1339731/
Abstract

Two check lists are used routinely in the statistical assessment of manuscripts submitted to the "BMJ." One is for papers of a general nature and the other specifically for reports on clinical trials. Each check list includes questions on the design, conduct, analysis, and presentation of studies, and answers to these contribute to the overall statistical evaluation. Only a small proportion of submitted papers are assessed statistically, and these are selected at the refereeing or editorial stage. Examination of the use of the check lists showed that most papers contained statistical failings, many of which could easily be remedied. It is recommended that the check lists should be used by statistical referees, editorial staff, and authors and also during the design stage of studies.

摘要

在对提交给《英国医学杂志》的稿件进行统计学评估时,通常会使用两份检查清单。一份用于一般性论文,另一份专门用于临床试验报告。每份检查清单都包含有关研究设计、实施、分析和呈现方面的问题,对这些问题的回答有助于进行全面的统计学评估。只有一小部分提交的论文会进行统计学评估,这些论文是在审稿或编辑阶段挑选出来的。对检查清单使用情况的审查表明,大多数论文存在统计学缺陷,其中许多缺陷很容易得到纠正。建议统计审稿人、编辑人员和作者在研究设计阶段以及整个过程中都使用这些检查清单。

相似文献

1
Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.使用核对清单评估医学研究的统计学内容。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 22;292(6523):810-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810.
2
An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal.对发表在《英国医学杂志》上的论文进行统计评估的探索性研究。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1355-7.
3
Should there be statistical guidelines for medical research papers?
Biometrics. 1978 Dec;34(4):687-95.
4
Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.再次核查对已发表论文中的统计数据提出了质疑。
Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):490. doi: 10.1038/429490a.
5
Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?对提交给《英国医学杂志》的论文进行的统计评估有效吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1485.
6
Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.对《澳大利亚兽医杂志》论文中使用的统计方法的评估。
Aust Vet J. 1995 Sep;72(9):322-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1995.tb07534.x.
7
Statistical errors in papers in the British Journal of Psychiatry.《英国精神病学杂志》论文中的统计错误。
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Oct;135:336-42. doi: 10.1192/bjp.135.4.336.
8
Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.《埃塞俄比亚医学杂志》的同行评审与编辑流程:对投稿稿件状态的十年评估
Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103.
9
What do peer reviewers do?同行评审员的职责是什么?
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1341-3.
10
[Presentation of statistical analysis in the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association].[挪威医学协会杂志中的统计分析呈现]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Aug 25;125(16):2183-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.为改进基金和期刊同行评审而进行的审稿人培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2.
2
A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers.关于生物医学期刊同行评审指南的范围综述:面向评审者。
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251440. eCollection 2021.
3
How well can we assess the validity of non-randomised studies of medications? A systematic review of assessment tools.我们能多好地评估药物非随机研究的有效性?评估工具的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e043961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043961.
4
CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers: the CHAMP statement.医学论文统计评估清单:CHAMP声明
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;55(18):1002-1003. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103651. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration.用于医学论文统计评估的清单(CHAMP 声明):解释和说明。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;55(18):1009-1017. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103652. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use.连续数据的非参数统计检验:基本概念与实际应用。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Feb;69(1):8-14. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.1.8. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.一种识别原发性混合方法研究关键评估标准的策略。
Qual Quant. 2004 Aug;38(4):351-65. doi: 10.1023/b:ququ.0000043126.25329.85.
8
Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies.用于评估药物流行病学安全性研究的质量评估工具综述
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 25;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001362. Print 2012.
9
From the Editor-in-Chief's Perspective ..从主编的视角来看……
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2008 Aug 20;1(1):3-6. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v1i1.14.
10
Analysis of statistical methods and errors in the articles published in the korean journal of pain.韩国疼痛杂志发表文章的统计方法和误差分析。
Korean J Pain. 2010 Mar;23(1):35-41. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2010.23.1.35. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Conference Report: Steaming up windows and refereeing medical papers.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Oct 30;285(6350):1259-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6350.1259.
2
Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?医学研究中的统计学与伦理学:III样本量应为多大?
Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1336-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336.
3
Aspirin-sensitive asthma: tolerance to aspirin after positive oral aspirin challenges.阿司匹林敏感性哮喘:口服阿司匹林激发试验阳性后对阿司匹林的耐受性
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1980 Jul;66(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(80)90143-8.
4
Severe anaphylaxis and drug-induced beta-blockade.
N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 23;308(25):1536.
5
Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.医学期刊投稿人统计指南。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1489.
6
Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?对提交给《英国医学杂志》的论文进行的统计评估有效吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1485.
7
Taste and smell in disease (first of two parts).疾病中的味觉和嗅觉(两部分中的第一部分)
N Engl J Med. 1983 May 26;308(21):1275-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198305263082107.
8
Assessing reports of therapeutic trials.
Br Med J. 1970 Sep 12;3(5723):637-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5723.637.
9
Manuscript review from a statistician's perspective.
JAMA. 1985 Jun 7;253(21):3145-7.
10
Statistics in medical journals: a survey of current policies and proposals for editors.
Med Pediatr Oncol. 1985;13(2):109-12. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950130215.