Suppr超能文献

对比引流在降低回肠袢式造口关闭术切口浅层感染中的效果:前瞻性随机对照试验。

The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Unidad de Coloproctología. Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Parc Tauli, 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1692-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04972-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loop ileostomy reduces the rates of morbidity due to colorectal anastomotic dehiscence. For its part, ileostomy closure is associated with low mortality (0-4%) but substantial morbidity (11-37%). Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications (2-40%).

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of two study groups: control (conventional primary skin closure) and experimental (primary skin closure with a contralateral Penrose drain).

RESULTS

Seventy patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between April 2013 and June 2017 were included (35 per branch). Four were later removed from the study. Six of the remaining 66 patients (per protocol analysis) were diagnosed with incisional SSI (9.1%); there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (control group: 9.7%; experimental group: 8.6%) or between the risk factors associated with incisional SSI. Rates of overall and relevant morbidity (Clavien ≥ III) were considerable (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No patients died.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral drainage does not significantly affect the results of primary ileostomy closure. The rate of incisional SSI was similar in the drainage and non-drainage groups, and the overall rate of 9.1% was in the low range of those reported in the literature. The absence of mortality (0%) and the non-negligible rates of overall and relevant morbidity (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively) in our series suggest that loop ileostomy is a safe procedure. However, the bowel reconstruction involves risks that must be borne in mind.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered and approved by the clinical research ethics committee of the study center (reference number 2012076). Clinical trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (identification number NCT02574702 and reference: ILEOS-ISS_2013).

摘要

背景

回肠造口术可降低结直肠吻合口裂开导致的发病率。然而,回肠造口关闭术与低死亡率(0-4%)相关,但发病率较高(11-37%)。切口部位手术部位感染(SSI)是最常见的并发症之一(2-40%)。

方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验,分为两组:对照组(常规一期皮肤缝合)和实验组(一期皮肤缝合加对侧彭罗斯引流管)。

结果

2013 年 4 月至 2017 年 6 月间共有 70 例患者接受回肠造口关闭术(每侧 35 例),其中 4 例术后失访。66 例患者中,6 例(按意向性分析)诊断为切口 SSI(9.1%),两组之间无统计学差异(对照组:9.7%;实验组:8.6%),也无与切口 SSI 相关的危险因素存在差异。总体和相关发病率(Clavien≥III)较高(分别为 28.1%和 9.1%),两组间无统计学差异。无患者死亡。

结论

对侧引流并不能显著影响一期回肠造口术的结果。引流组和非引流组的切口 SSI 发生率相似,总体发生率为 9.1%,处于文献报道的低水平。本研究无死亡率(0%),且总体和相关发病率(分别为 28.1%和 9.1%)不可忽视,提示回肠造口术是一种安全的手术。然而,肠重建术存在风险,必须引起重视。

临床试验注册

该研究已在研究中心的临床研究伦理委员会注册并获得批准(注册号 2012076)。临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(注册号 NCT02574702,参考号:ILEOS-ISS_2013)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验