Utrecht University.
University of Turku.
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):e637-e653. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13228. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
This study examined the coevolution of prosocial and aggressive popularity norms with popularity hierarchy (asymmetries in students' popularity). Cross-lagged-panel analyses were conducted on 2,843 secondary school students (N = 120; M = 13.18; 51.3% girls). Popularity hierarchy predicted relative change in popularity norms over time, but not vice versa. Specifically, classrooms with few highly popular and many unpopular students increased in aggressive popularity norms at the beginning of the school year and decreased in prosocial popularity norms at the end of the year. Also, strong within-classroom asymmetries in popularity predicted relatively higher aggressive popularity norms. These findings may indicate that hierarchical contexts elicit competition for popularity, with high aggression and low prosocial behavior being seen as valuable tools to achieve popularity.
这项研究考察了亲社会和攻击型受欢迎规范与受欢迎程度等级(学生受欢迎程度的不对称)的共同演变。对 2843 名中学生(N=120;M=13.18;51.3%为女生)进行了交叉滞后面板分析。受欢迎程度等级预测了随着时间的推移受欢迎规范的相对变化,但反之则不然。具体而言,在学年开始时,高度受欢迎的学生和许多不受欢迎的学生较少的班级中,攻击型受欢迎规范增加,而亲社会受欢迎规范在学年结束时减少。此外,班级内受欢迎程度的强烈不对称也预示着相对较高的攻击性受欢迎规范。这些发现可能表明,等级环境引发了对受欢迎程度的竞争,高攻击性和低亲社会行为被视为获得受欢迎程度的有价值工具。