Steiner Riley J, Swartzendruber Andrea, Cushing Katherine, Gaydos Laura M, Pazol Karen, Kramer Michael R, Holt Stephanie, Sales Jessica M
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia College of Public Health, Athens, Georgia.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Aug;32(4):388-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.02.122. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Quantitative data suggest that adolescent users of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), compared with short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA]), might be less likely to use condoms. We qualitatively describe and explain adolescent contraceptive users' motivations for condom use, including variation according to contraceptive type.
Individual, in-depth qualitative interviews, analyzed thematically.
Participants were recruited from public family planning clinics and an adolescent medicine clinic, as well as university and other community settings in Atlanta, Georgia.
Sexually active contraceptive users aged 17-19 years old (n = 30), including LARC (n = 10), DMPA (n = 10), and oral contraceptive (n = 10) users.
Of the 30 participants, most (n = 25; 83%) used condoms with their more effective contraceptive method, although 11 of 25 used them inconsistently (44%). Oral contraceptive users were particularly motivated to use condoms for pregnancy prevention, because of concerns about contraceptive method efficacy and a desire to be on "the safe side." In contrast, LARC users were primarily motivated by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention. DMPA users' motivations were more mixed. Across contraceptive type, factors influencing condom use motivations included sexual health education, personal awareness and/or experience, and perceived consequences and risk.
Because all participants were using an effective contraceptive method, it is notable that pregnancy prevention was a prominent motivator for using condoms, although LARC users reported STI prevention to be a more important motivation. Parental and school-based sexual health education that clearly addresses STI prevention in addition to pregnancy prevention has the potential to influence condom use motivations and behavior.
定量数据表明,与短效避孕方法(避孕药、避孕贴片、阴道环、醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针[DMPA])相比,长效可逆避孕法(LARC)的青少年使用者使用避孕套的可能性可能较小。我们定性地描述并解释青少年避孕使用者使用避孕套的动机,包括因避孕类型而异的情况。
进行个体深度定性访谈,并进行主题分析。
参与者从公共计划生育诊所、青少年医学诊所,以及佐治亚州亚特兰大的大学和其他社区场所招募。
17 - 19岁有性行为的避孕使用者(n = 30),包括LARC使用者(n = 10)、DMPA使用者(n = 10)和口服避孕药使用者(n = 10)。
在30名参与者中,大多数(n = 25;83%)在使用更有效的避孕方法时会使用避孕套,尽管25人中有11人使用避孕套并不规律(44%)。口服避孕药使用者特别有动力使用避孕套来预防怀孕,这是出于对避孕方法效果的担忧以及希望“更安全”的愿望。相比之下,LARC使用者主要是出于预防性传播感染(STI)的动机。DMPA使用者的动机则更为复杂。在不同避孕类型中,影响使用避孕套动机的因素包括性健康教育、个人意识和/或经验,以及感知到的后果和风险。
由于所有参与者都在使用有效的避孕方法,值得注意的是,预防怀孕是使用避孕套的一个重要动机,尽管LARC使用者报告预防性传播感染是一个更重要的动机。除了预防怀孕之外,明确涉及预防性传播感染的家长和学校性健康教育有可能影响使用避孕套的动机和行为。